Comparison Overview
Michael Kors

Michael Kors
11 West 42 Street, None, New York, New York, US, 10036
Last Update: 08/03/2026
Michael Kors is a world-renowned, award-winning designer of luxury accessories and ready-to-wear. His namesake company, established in 1981, currently produces a range of products under Michael Kors Collection, Michael Kors, and Michael Kors Mens, including accessories,...

HUGO BOSS
Holy-Allee 3, Metzingen, Baden-Württemberg, DE, 72555
Last Update: 10/09/2026
At HUGO BOSS, we firmly believe that the passion and dedication of our employees is the essence for the successful execution of our “CLAIM 5 TOUCHDOWN” growth strategy. A strong commitment to empowering people and teams is therefore firmly anchored in “CLAIM 5 TOUCHDOWN...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Michael Kors







HUGO BOSS






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Michael Kors in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for HUGO BOSS in 2026.
Incident History - Michael Kors (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Michael Kors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - HUGO BOSS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
HUGO BOSS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Michael Kors

HUGO BOSS
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.