Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Deakin CollegeDeakin College
VS
Indiana University BloomingtonIndiana University Bloomington
Deakin College

Deakin College

221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood, Victoria 3125, AU

Last Update: 21/04/2026

View Profile
771/1000Fair

Deakin College is a direct pathway to Deakin University, providing students with experience that supports successful transition to further studies at Deakin University. We deliver: - Innovative teaching and learning - A positive student experience - Engagement with...

NAICS:611
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Indiana University Bloomington

Indiana University Bloomington

107 S Indiana Ave, Bloomington, Indiana, US, 47405

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://bloomington.iu.edu
810/1000Good

Indiana University Bloomington is the flagship residential, research-intensive campus of Indiana University. Its academic excellence is grounded in the humanities, arts and sciences, and a range of highly ranked professional programs. Founded in 1820, the campus serve...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:29,998
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Deakin College

Deakin College

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Indiana University Bloomington

Indiana University Bloomington

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deakin College in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indiana University Bloomington in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Deakin College (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deakin College cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Indiana University Bloomington (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indiana University Bloomington cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Deakin College

Deakin College

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Indiana University Bloomington

Indiana University Bloomington

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Deakin College company and Indiana University Bloomington company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Deakin College company and Indiana University Bloomington company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Deakin College company and Indiana University Bloomington company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Deakin College company and Indiana University Bloomington company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Deakin College company and Indiana University Bloomington company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Deakin College company and Indiana University Bloomington company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Deakin College company and Indiana University Bloomington company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Deakin College company and Indiana University Bloomington company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Deakin College company and Indiana University Bloomington company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Deakin College company and Indiana University Bloomington company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Deakin College company and Indiana University Bloomington company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Deakin College and Indiana University Bloomington, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Deakin College and Indiana University Bloomington, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Deakin College or Indiana University Bloomington ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Deakin College or Indiana University Bloomington ?
Between Deakin College and Indiana University Bloomington, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Deakin College and Indiana University Bloomington, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2