Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Michigan Department of Attorney GeneralMichigan Department of Attorney General
VS
City of TorontoCity of Toronto
Michigan Department of Attorney General

Michigan Department of Attorney General

525 W. Ottawa Street, Lansing, 48909, US

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.michigan.gov/ag
762/1000Fair

Official page with helpful information, updates and the latest news from Michigan's Department of Attorney General, led by Attorney General Dana Nessel. Page is managed by department staff and is not a personal page for Attorney General Nessel.

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:321
Subsidiaries:43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
City of Toronto

City of Toronto

Toronto City Hall, 100 Queen Street West, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M5H 2N2

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.toronto.ca
726/1000Moderate

The City of Toronto is committed to fostering a positive and progressive workplace culture, and strives to build a workforce that reflects the citizens it serves. We are committed to building a high performing public service, with strong and effective leaders to enable ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:22,766
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Michigan Department of Attorney General

Michigan Department of Attorney General

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
City of Toronto

City of Toronto

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Michigan Department of Attorney General in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Toronto in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Michigan Department of Attorney General (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Michigan Department of Attorney General cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - City of Toronto (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Toronto cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Michigan Department of Attorney General

Michigan Department of Attorney General

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
City of Toronto

City of Toronto

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CIT34121023
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
CIT22524423

FAQ

Between Michigan Department of Attorney General company and City of Toronto company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Michigan Department of Attorney General company and City of Toronto company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Michigan Department of Attorney General company and City of Toronto company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Michigan Department of Attorney General company and City of Toronto company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Michigan Department of Attorney General company and City of Toronto company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Michigan Department of Attorney General company and City of Toronto company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Michigan Department of Attorney General company and City of Toronto company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Michigan Department of Attorney General company and City of Toronto company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Michigan Department of Attorney General company and City of Toronto company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Michigan Department of Attorney General company and City of Toronto company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Michigan Department of Attorney General company and City of Toronto company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Michigan Department of Attorney General and City of Toronto, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Michigan Department of Attorney General and City of Toronto, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Michigan Department of Attorney General or City of Toronto ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Michigan Department of Attorney General or City of Toronto ?
Between Michigan Department of Attorney General and City of Toronto, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Michigan Department of Attorney General and City of Toronto, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1