Comparison Overview
MGS, a Coesia company
MGS, a Coesia company
9900 85th Ave N, None, Maple Grove, MN, US, 55369
Last Update: 13/03/2026
Who We Are: At MGS, we design and manufacture state-of-the-art packaging automation solutions for a wide range of industries. Our people are experts at integration, and our passion for problem solving and commitment to delivering an exceptional customer experience make ...
Murugappa Group
"Dare House" 234, N S C Bose Road, Chennai, 600001, IN
Last Update: 23/09/2026
About Murugappa Group A 125-year-old conglomerate with presence across India and the world, the INR 902 billion (90,178 crore) Murugappa Group has diverse businesses in agriculture, engineering, financial services and more. The Group has 10 listed companies: Carboru...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
MGS, a Coesia company
Murugappa Group
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for MGS, a Coesia company in 2026.
Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Murugappa Group in 2026.
Incident History - MGS, a Coesia company (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MGS, a Coesia company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Murugappa Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Murugappa Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
MGS, a Coesia company
Murugappa Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.