Comparison Overview

MGM Resorts International

VS

Mandarin Oriental

MGM Resorts International

840 Grier Drive, Las Vegas, 89119, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 0 and 549

The resorts and casinos of MGM Resorts International™ are some of the most famous in the world. Our 28 destinations are renowned for their winning combination of quality entertainment, luxurious facilities, and exceptional customer service. We are actively expanding our presence globally, with potential developments in a number of domestic and international markets. At MGM Resorts International, we are all striving together to deliver an enticing blend of entertainment to every corner of the world. Many of our resorts are located in Las Vegas. Las Vegas features three of the largest convention centers in the U.S., spectacular entertainment, attractions, shopping, ​and world-famous resorts. Whether dancing fountains, incredible stage productions, casino action, museums or natural attractions such as Lake Mead, Vegas offers something for everyone. A stroll down our streets takes you around the globe, with recreations like climbing to the top of the Eiffel Tower or taking a Venetian gondola ride. From shimmering resort pools and spa rejuvenation to nonstop nightlife, Las Vegas promises an unforgettable career destination. With all of our unique and spectacular resorts and casinos, MGM Resorts International has a world of opportunities for you to discover excitement and rewards as you provide our guests with a wonderful and memorable experience. Take a closer look at our properties. We think you'll find an opportunity that's right for you. The 81,000 global employees of MGM Resorts are proud to be recognized as one of FORTUNE® Magazine’s World’s Most Admired Companies®.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 26,464
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Mandarin Oriental

18 Westlands Road, Quarry Bay, ., HK
Last Update: 2026-01-18

Mandarin Oriental Hotel Group is the award-winning owner and operator of some of the world’s most luxurious hotels, resorts and residences. Having grown from its Asian roots into a global brand, the Group now operates 43 hotels, 12 residences and 23 exclusive homes in 26 countries and territories, with each property reflecting the Group’s oriental heritage, local culture and unique design. Mandarin Oriental has a strong pipeline of hotels and residences under development and is a member of the Jardine Matheson Group. Mandarin Oriental’s aim is to be recognised widely as the best global luxury hotel group, providing 21st-century luxury with oriental charm in each of its hotels. This will be achieved by investing in the Group’s exceptional facilities and people while maximizing profitability and long-term shareholder value. The Group regularly receives recognition and awards for outstanding service and quality management. The strategy of the Group is to open the hotels currently under development while continuing to seek further selective opportunities for expansion around the world. The parent company, Mandarin Oriental International Limited, is incorporated in Bermuda and has a premium listing on the London Stock Exchange, with secondary listings in Bermuda and Singapore. Mandarin Oriental Hotel Group International Limited, which operates from Hong Kong, manages the activities of the Group’s hotels. Mandarin Oriental is a member of the Jardine Matheson Group.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 13,845
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mgm-resorts-international.jpeg
MGM Resorts International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mandarin-oriental-hotel-group.jpeg
Mandarin Oriental
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MGM Resorts International
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mandarin Oriental
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MGM Resorts International in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mandarin Oriental in 2026.

Incident History — MGM Resorts International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MGM Resorts International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mandarin Oriental (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mandarin Oriental cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mgm-resorts-international.jpeg
MGM Resorts International
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Social Engineering, Phishing, SIM Swapping, Hypervisor-Level Attacks
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Ransomware, Swatting, Extortion, DDoS, SIM Swapping, Cryptocurrency Theft
Motivation: Financial Gain, Retaliation, Ideology, Sexual Gratification, Notoriety
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Social Engineering, Vishing, SIM-swapping, MFA Fatigue Attacks
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mandarin-oriental-hotel-group.jpeg
Mandarin Oriental
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2014
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Mandarin Oriental company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MGM Resorts International company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

MGM Resorts International company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Mandarin Oriental company.

In the current year, Mandarin Oriental company and MGM Resorts International company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Both Mandarin Oriental company and MGM Resorts International company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

MGM Resorts International company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Mandarin Oriental company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Mandarin Oriental company and MGM Resorts International company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

Neither MGM Resorts International company nor Mandarin Oriental company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MGM Resorts International nor Mandarin Oriental holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

MGM Resorts International company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Mandarin Oriental company.

MGM Resorts International company employs more people globally than Mandarin Oriental company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Neither MGM Resorts International nor Mandarin Oriental holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MGM Resorts International nor Mandarin Oriental holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MGM Resorts International nor Mandarin Oriental holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MGM Resorts International nor Mandarin Oriental holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MGM Resorts International nor Mandarin Oriental holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MGM Resorts International nor Mandarin Oriental holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H