Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade of Hungary

Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade of Hungary Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

kormany.hu

Official page of Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.


MFATH A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

MFATH
Company Information
Website:https://www.kormany.hu/hu/kulgazdasagi-es-kulugyminiszterium
Employees number:643
Number of followers:4,489
NAICS:92
Industry Type:Government Administration
Homepage:kormany.hu
MFATH Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
logo
MFATHGovernment Administration
Updated:
11/04/2026
739/1000
Moderate
Ba
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
MFATH Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
MFATHGovernment Administration
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

MFATH
MFATHModerate
Current Score
739Ba (MODERATE)
01000
1 incidents
0 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JULY 2026
741Before Incident
JUNE 2026
740Before Incident
MAY 2026
740Before Incident
APRIL 2026
739Before Incident
MARCH 2026
739Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
738Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
738Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
733Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
732Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
732Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
731Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
731Before Incident
JANUARY 2021
763Before Incident
Breach
01 Jan 2021MFATH
Hungarian Government and NATO eLearning Platform: Hungary officials used weak passwords exposed in breach dump

Hungarian Government Security Crisis Due to Weak Passwords and Credential Reuse

677After Incident
CRITICAL-86
MFANAT1775903094
Hungarian Government Faces Security Crisis Due to Weak Passwords and Credential Reuse A Bellingcat investigation has exposed a major security lapse within Hungary’s government, revealing nearly 800 compromised email and password pairs tied to key ministries, including defense, foreign affairs, and finance. The findings suggest systemic negligence rather than targeted hacking, with officials relying on weak, reused passwords that eventually surfaced in breach dumps. Among the most concerning discoveries were 120 compromised records linked to defense personnel, some stemming from a 2023 NATO eLearning platform breach that exposed emails, passwords, and phone numbers. While much of the data dates back to 2021, new instances continue to emerge, with some recent infostealer logs indicating active device compromises as recently as last month. Password choices were particularly alarming. A colonel in "information security" used "FrankLampard" a reference to the former England footballer while a district director opted for "123456aA." Another senior official in Hungary’s NATO delegation used a password translating to "cute." Other examples included simple name-based passwords, easily guessable patterns, and credentials like "linkedinlinkedin" likely from the 2012 LinkedIn breach still in use. The root issue appears to be poor security hygiene: officials registered government emails on third-party services, then reused passwords across multiple platforms. Once those services were breached, the credentials spread through underground markets. The investigation also uncovered infostealer malware logs, suggesting some devices were actively compromised rather than just caught in old leaks. The incident underscores how basic security failures weak passwords, credential reuse, and unchecked third-party sign-ups can undermine even critical government functions. With no advanced hacking required, the breach highlights the persistent risks of human error in cybersecurity.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Credential Compromise
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Email addresses, passwords, phone numbers, personally identifiable informationSystems Affected: Government email systems, third-party services used by officialsOperational Impact: Potential compromise of government communications and sensitive informationBrand Reputation Impact: Significant damage to government cybersecurity reputationIdentity Theft Risk: High risk due to exposure of PII and credentials
DATA BREACH
Email addressesPasswordsPhone numbersPersonally Identifiable InformationNumber Of Records Exposed: Nearly 800Sensitivity Of Data: HighPersonally Identifiable Information: Yes

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for MFATH ?
?
What was MFATH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was MFATH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was MFATH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was MFATH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was MFATH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was MFATH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was MFATH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was MFATH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was MFATH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was MFATH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was MFATH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on MFATH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with MFATH ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view MFATH's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?