Comparison Overview

METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN

VS

pct2ep by AdamsonJones

METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN

33 East Schrock Road, Westerville, Ohio, 43081, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

For more than 50 years, Metz, Bailey & McLoughlin has provided sophisticated and customized estate planning and business law services to clients throughout Ohio. Our team of attorneys is equipped with the skills and experience to offer insightful solutions to enable the fulfillment of your goals for the future. That commitment to each client's future is reflected in our attentive and tailored service throughout the estate planning process and in the administration of that plan in the future. You can trust that our law firm will empower you with the information and insight needed to make the best decisions for your future. This guidance will be available both as the plan is being created and as it requires adaptation to reflect major life changes through the years. Our firm handles complicated legal issues, including estate planning, probate, business law, labor and employment, business mergers and formation, and municipal law.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

pct2ep by AdamsonJones

Nottingham, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-29

AdamsonJones brings you pct2ep - a dedicated resource for overseas associates seeking reliable and efficient European regional phase entry by experienced European Patent Attorneys. A cost estimate for your application can be obtained immediately via our online cost estimator, and your application processed within 48 hours on receipt of your instructions. With pct2ep you have access to all the information you need regarding European patent applications, including useful tips and advice on procedure and costs for each stage of the process.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metz-bailey-&-mcloughlin.jpeg
METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pct2ep.jpeg
pct2ep by AdamsonJones
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
pct2ep by AdamsonJones
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for pct2ep by AdamsonJones in 2025.

Incident History — METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — pct2ep by AdamsonJones (X = Date, Y = Severity)

pct2ep by AdamsonJones cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metz-bailey-&-mcloughlin.jpeg
METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pct2ep.jpeg
pct2ep by AdamsonJones
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2021
Type:Breach
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

pct2ep by AdamsonJones company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

pct2ep by AdamsonJones company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN company has not reported any.

In the current year, pct2ep by AdamsonJones company and METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither pct2ep by AdamsonJones company nor METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

pct2ep by AdamsonJones company has disclosed at least one data breach, while METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither pct2ep by AdamsonJones company nor METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN company nor pct2ep by AdamsonJones company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN nor pct2ep by AdamsonJones holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

pct2ep by AdamsonJones company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN company.

Neither METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN nor pct2ep by AdamsonJones holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN nor pct2ep by AdamsonJones holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN nor pct2ep by AdamsonJones holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN nor pct2ep by AdamsonJones holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN nor pct2ep by AdamsonJones holds HIPAA certification.

Neither METZ BAILEY & MCLOUGHLIN nor pct2ep by AdamsonJones holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X