Comparison Overview
Metso
Metso
Rauhalanpuisto 9, P.O. Box 1000, Espoo, Uusimaa, FI, 02230
Last Update: 05/04/2026
Metso is a frontrunner in sustainable technologies, end-to-end solutions and services for the aggregates, minerals processing and metals refining industries globally. By improving our customers’ energy and water efficiency, increasing their productivity, and reducing ...
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
2−3 Marunouchi 3-Chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, JP, 100-8332
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) Group is one of the world’s leading industrial firms. For more than 130 years, we have channeled big thinking into solutions that move the world forward – advancing the lives of everyone who shares our planet. We deliver innovative and ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Metso
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Metso in 2026.
Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries in 2026.
Incident History - Metso (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Metso cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Metso
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an inadequate encryption strength vulnerability which could allow an attacker to steal admin credentials via weak hash or a pass-the-hash attack.
Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere vulnerability which could allow for asset discovery by unauthenticated users.
Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an unintended proxy or intermediary vulnerability which could allow an attacker to use an active proxy, which would bypass OT segmentation.
Pronetiqs IntraVUE Versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have a plaintext storage of a password vulnerability that could expose cleartext credentials through the API.
Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere vulnerability which could expose the underlying host/share filesystem.