Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MetsoMetso
VS
SKF GroupSKF Group
Metso

Metso

Rauhalanpuisto 9, Espoo, 02230, FI

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.metso.com/
780/1000Fair

Metso is a frontrunner in sustainable technologies, end-to-end solutions and services for the aggregates, minerals processing and metals refining industries globally.  By improving our customers’ energy and water efficiency, increasing their productivity, and reducing ...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:20,368
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SKF Group

SKF Group

Sven Wingquist Gata 2, Göteborg, SE-415 50, SE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.skf.com
785/1000Fair

We fight friction to move the world forward. 20% of all energy consumed is spent overcoming friction. At SKF, we’re constantly fighting that friction, to reduce energy waste and make the most of the resources we have. Since 1907, we’ve been making some of the world’...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:19,880
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Metso

Metso

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SKF Group

SKF Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metso in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SKF Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Metso (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metso cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SKF Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SKF Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Metso

Metso

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SKF Group

SKF Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Metso company and SKF Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Metso company and SKF Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Metso company and SKF Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Metso company and SKF Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Metso company and SKF Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Metso company and SKF Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Metso company and SKF Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Metso company and SKF Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Metso company and SKF Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Metso company and SKF Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Metso company and SKF Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Metso and SKF Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Metso and SKF Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Metso or SKF Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Metso or SKF Group ?
Between Metso and SKF Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Metso and SKF Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-53532
SUMMARY

OpenEXR is the reference implementation and specification for the EXR image format, widely used in the motion picture industry. In versions 3.4.0 through 3.4.12, a crafted HTJ2K-compressed EXR file causes an unconditional process abort in any application that calls exr_start_read() on untrusted input, resulting in denial of service. The crash is triggered by a QCD marker whose lower five bits are zero, which OpenEXR passes into the vendored OpenJPH library while constructing the codestream and evaluating its quantization delta parameters. OpenJPH uses an assertion rather than a recoverable error to validate those bits, so any invalid value calls abort() directly and cannot be intercepted by surrounding error handling, a problem compounded by OpenEXR wrapping only its internal HT header parser in error handling while leaving the later codestream read and construction calls unprotected. This issue has been resolved in version 3.4.13.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-24
UPDATED
Date2026-08-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-78435
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in Faveo Helpdesk up to 2.0.3. Affected is the function unlink of the file app/Http/Controllers/Admin/helpdesk/SettingsController.php of the component Logo Handler. Such manipulation of the argument data1 leads to path traversal. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-24
UPDATED
Date2026-08-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.8)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.7
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:N/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-78434
SUMMARY

A flaw has been found in Faveo Helpdesk up to 2.0.3. This impacts the function FormController::post_ticket_reply of the file app/Http/Controllers/Client/helpdesk/FormController.php of the component post-ticket-reply Endpoint. This manipulation causes missing authentication. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-24
UPDATED
Date2026-08-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.4
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-78284
SUMMARY

Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Deletion in MasterStudy LMS <= 3.7.42 versions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-24
UPDATED
Date2026-08-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-78282
SUMMARY

Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Stripe Payments <= 2.1.2 versions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-24
UPDATED
Date2026-08-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8