Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Metroline ManchesterMetroline Manchester
VS
LyftLyft
Metroline Manchester

Metroline Manchester

Manchester, GB

Last Update: 28/04/2026

View Profile
755/1000Fair

A dynamic and ambitious company, Metroline is proud to serve Greater Manchester. We’re buzzing to serve Greater Manchester’s community as part of the Bee Network from January 2025. We’ll be operating the Hyde Road, Sharston, Tameside and Wythenshawe depots and their as...

NAICS:485
NAICS Definition:Transit and Ground Passenger Transportation
Employees:118
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Lyft

Lyft

185 Berry Street, San Francisco, CA, US, 94107

Last Update: 30/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.lyft.com/
737/1000Moderate

Whether it’s an everyday commute or a journey that changes everything, Lyft is driven by our purpose: to serve and connect. In 2012, Lyft was founded as one of the first ridesharing communities in the United States. Now, millions of drivers have chosen to earn on billio...

NAICS:485
NAICS Definition:Transit and Ground Passenger Transportation
Employees:27,444
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Metroline Manchester

Metroline Manchester

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lyft

Lyft

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Ground Passenger Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metroline Manchester in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Ground Passenger Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

Lyft has 7.41% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Metroline Manchester (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metroline Manchester cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lyft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lyft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Metroline Manchester

Metroline Manchester

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Lyft

Lyft

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ELFTEMCOUGRUAMASAMLYF1777580773

FAQ

Between Metroline Manchester company and Lyft company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Metroline Manchester company and Lyft company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Metroline Manchester company and Lyft company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Metroline Manchester company and Lyft company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Metroline Manchester company and Lyft company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Metroline Manchester company and Lyft company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Metroline Manchester company and Lyft company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Metroline Manchester company and Lyft company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Metroline Manchester company and Lyft company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Metroline Manchester company and Lyft company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Metroline Manchester company and Lyft company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Metroline Manchester and Lyft, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Metroline Manchester and Lyft, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Metroline Manchester or Lyft ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Metroline Manchester or Lyft ?
Between Metroline Manchester and Lyft, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Metroline Manchester and Lyft, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-53465
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to version 7.1.2-25, a crafted multi-frame can result in a heap buffer over-write when encoding it with the SF3 encoder. This issue has been patched in version 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-53464
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to version 7.1.2-25, when providing invalid options to the wand option parser a small memory leak will occur. This issue has been patched in version 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-53463
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25, when passing incorrect arguments in the distort operation a null pointer deference will occur. This issue has been patched in versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-53462
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25, when an allocation fails in CheckPrimitiveExtent this can result in a heap-use-after-free and result in a crash. This issue has been patched in versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-53461
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25, an incorrect loop in the ICON decoder can result in an out of bounds heap write resulting in a crash. This issue has been patched in versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9