Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MetLife JapanMetLife Japan
VS
QBE InsuranceQBE Insurance
MetLife Japan

MetLife Japan

1-3, Kioicho, , Chiyoda-ku, 1028525, JP

Last Update: 18/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.metlife.co.jp
693/1000Weak

メットライフ生命は、日本初の外資系生命保険会社として1973年に営業を開始し、多様な販売チャネル を通して、個人・法人のお客さまに革新的かつ幅広いリスクに対応できる商品を提供してまいりました。現在は日本法人「メットライフ生命保険株式会社」として、お客さまに常に寄り添い、お客さま自らが自信を持って最適な保障を選ぶお手伝いをし続けることに努めています。 MetLife started operations in 1973 as the first foreign life insurance company in Japan....

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:672
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
QBE Insurance

QBE Insurance

388 George Street, Sydney, New South Wales, AU, 2000

Last Update: 19/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.qbe.com
789/1000Fair

At QBE we’re driven by our purpose of enabling a more resilient future. QBE is an international insurer and reinsurer headquartered in Sydney, Australia, with local presence in 26 countries. We don't just see ourselves as an insurer, but a partner to our customers i...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:14,066
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MetLife Japan

MetLife Japan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
QBE Insurance

QBE Insurance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

MetLife Japan has 33.33% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for QBE Insurance in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MetLife Japan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MetLife Japan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - QBE Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

QBE Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MetLife Japan

MetLife Japan

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
METNIPTHE1773829914
QBE Insurance

QBE Insurance

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
QBE1779179280

FAQ

Between MetLife Japan company and QBE Insurance company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MetLife Japan company and QBE Insurance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MetLife Japan company and QBE Insurance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MetLife Japan company and QBE Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MetLife Japan company and QBE Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MetLife Japan company and QBE Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MetLife Japan company and QBE Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MetLife Japan company and QBE Insurance company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MetLife Japan company and QBE Insurance company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MetLife Japan company and QBE Insurance company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MetLife Japan company and QBE Insurance company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MetLife Japan and QBE Insurance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MetLife Japan and QBE Insurance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MetLife Japan or QBE Insurance ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MetLife Japan or QBE Insurance ?
Between MetLife Japan and QBE Insurance, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MetLife Japan and QBE Insurance, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3