Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.comMETEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com
VS
ThoughtworksThoughtworks
METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com

METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com

Marcel-Breuer Straße 16, München, 80807, DE

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
755/1000Fair

METEONOMIQS ist das B2B Data Solutions-Angebot von wetter.com. Mit unseren datengetriebenen Insights und Lösungen eröffnen wir Ihnen neue Perspektiven, bessere Entscheidungen zu treffen und unentdeckte Geschäftspotenziale zu heben. Dafür setzen wir modernste Methoden au...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Thoughtworks

Thoughtworks

200 E Randolph St, 25th Floor, Chicago, IL, US, 60601-6501

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thoughtworks.com
792/1000Fair

We are a global technology consultancy that delivers extraordinary impact by blending design, engineering and AI expertise. For 30 years, our commitment to design-led thinking, engineering excellence and innovation means we prioritize people, build teams with strong te...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:12,302
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com

METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Thoughtworks

Thoughtworks

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thoughtworks in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Thoughtworks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thoughtworks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com

METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Thoughtworks

Thoughtworks

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com company and Thoughtworks company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com company and Thoughtworks company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com company and Thoughtworks company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com company and Thoughtworks company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com company and Thoughtworks company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com company and Thoughtworks company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com company and Thoughtworks company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com company and Thoughtworks company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com company and Thoughtworks company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com company and Thoughtworks company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com company and Thoughtworks company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com and Thoughtworks, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com and Thoughtworks, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com or Thoughtworks ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com or Thoughtworks ?
Between METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com and Thoughtworks, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between METEONOMIQS powered by wetter.com and Thoughtworks, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8