Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Metaval AustraliaMetaval Australia
VS
SiemensSiemens
Metaval Australia

Metaval Australia

N/A

Last Update: 19/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.metaval.com/au
745/1000Moderate

Pioneering precision engineering in Australia. As a family-owned mechanical engineering company since 1967, Metaval has been at the forefront of innovation, delivering precision-engineered solutions that empower industries across the globe. Based in Australia, we take p...

NAICS:33325
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Siemens

Siemens

Werner-von-Siemens-Straße 1, Munich, 80333, DE

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.siemens.com
784/1000Fair

Siemens AG (Berlin and Munich) is a leading technology company focused on industry, infrastructure, mobility, and healthcare. The company’s purpose is to create technology to transform the everyday, for everyone. By combining the real and the digital worlds, Siemens emp...

NAICS:33325
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:255,207
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Metaval Australia

Metaval Australia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Siemens

Siemens

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metaval Australia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Siemens in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Metaval Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metaval Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Siemens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Siemens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Metaval Australia

Metaval Australia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Siemens

Siemens

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
DIM4992449100425
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
SIE903031625

FAQ

Between Metaval Australia company and Siemens company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Metaval Australia company and Siemens company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Metaval Australia company and Siemens company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Metaval Australia company and Siemens company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Metaval Australia company and Siemens company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Metaval Australia company and Siemens company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Metaval Australia company and Siemens company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Metaval Australia company and Siemens company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Metaval Australia company and Siemens company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Metaval Australia company and Siemens company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Metaval Australia company and Siemens company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Metaval Australia and Siemens, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Metaval Australia and Siemens, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Metaval Australia or Siemens ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Metaval Australia or Siemens ?
Between Metaval Australia and Siemens, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Metaval Australia and Siemens, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1