Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Metaswitch NetworksMetaswitch Networks
VS
Motorola SolutionsMotorola Solutions
Metaswitch Networks

Metaswitch Networks

100 Church Street, Enfield, undefined, EN2 6BQ, GB

Last Update: 05/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.metaswitch.com
753/1000Fair

Metaswitch is an Alianza company. For more information, please visit: http//www.alianza.com

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:127
Subsidiaries:51
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Motorola Solutions

Motorola Solutions

500 W. Monroe Street, Chicago, 60661, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
790/1000Fair

About Motorola Solutions | Solving for safer Safety and security are at the heart of everything we do at Motorola Solutions. We build and connect technologies to help protect people, property and places. Our solutions foster the collaboration that’s critical for safer ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:27,132
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Metaswitch Networks

Metaswitch Networks

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Motorola Solutions

Motorola Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metaswitch Networks in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Motorola Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Metaswitch Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metaswitch Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Motorola Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Motorola Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Metaswitch Networks

Metaswitch Networks

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Motorola Solutions

Motorola Solutions

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MOT000011325

FAQ

Between Metaswitch Networks company and Motorola Solutions company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Metaswitch Networks company and Motorola Solutions company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Metaswitch Networks company and Motorola Solutions company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Metaswitch Networks company and Motorola Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Metaswitch Networks company and Motorola Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Metaswitch Networks company and Motorola Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Metaswitch Networks company and Motorola Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Metaswitch Networks company and Motorola Solutions company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Metaswitch Networks company and Motorola Solutions company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Metaswitch Networks company and Motorola Solutions company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Metaswitch Networks company and Motorola Solutions company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Metaswitch Networks and Motorola Solutions, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Metaswitch Networks and Motorola Solutions, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Metaswitch Networks or Motorola Solutions ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Metaswitch Networks or Motorola Solutions ?
Between Metaswitch Networks and Motorola Solutions, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Metaswitch Networks and Motorola Solutions, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA