Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda.Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda.
VS
FinningFinning
Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda.

Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda.

Rua Fernão Dias, 14, Cajamar, São Paulo, 07790-560, BR

Last Update: 19/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.metalplan.com.br
744/1000Moderate

A Metalplan, primeiro fabricante de compressores do mundo a conquistar a certificação ISO 50001 - Gestão de Energia - é líder no mercado de compressores de parafuso até 25 hp no Brasil. Nossos equipamentos para ar comprimido, gases e refrigeração industrial são 100% na...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:68
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Finning

Finning

CA

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.finning.com
771/1000Fair

Finning is the world's largest Caterpillar dealer delivering unrivalled service for over 90 years. We sell, rent and provide parts and service for equipment and engines to customers in various industries, including mining, construction, petroleum, forestry and a wide ra...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:10,704
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda.

Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Finning

Finning

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Finning in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Finning (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Finning cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda.

Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Finning

Finning

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda. company and Finning company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda. company and Finning company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda. company and Finning company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda. company and Finning company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda. company and Finning company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda. company and Finning company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda. company and Finning company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda. company and Finning company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda. company and Finning company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda. company and Finning company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda. company and Finning company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda. and Finning, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda. and Finning, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda. or Finning ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda. or Finning ?
Between Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda. and Finning, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Metalplan Equipamentos Ltda. and Finning, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9