Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Metallic.ioMetallic.io
VS
NTT DATA, Inc.NTT DATA, Inc.
Metallic.io

Metallic.io

1 Commvault Way, Tinton Falls, 07724, US

Last Update: 07/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.metallic.io
754/1000Fair

Metallic is a SaaS backup and recovery solution that gives you enterprise-grade data protection at warp speed with ultimate flexibility.

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
NTT DATA, Inc.

NTT DATA, Inc.

Tokyo, JP

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://services.global.ntt/
809/1000Good

NTT DATA, Inc. is a trusted global innovator of business and technology services. We're committed to helping clients innovate, optimize and transform for long-term success. Our R&D investments help organizations and society move confidently and sustainably into the digi...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:59,652
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Metallic.io

Metallic.io

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NTT DATA, Inc.

NTT DATA, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metallic.io in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NTT DATA, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Metallic.io (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metallic.io cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NTT DATA, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NTT DATA, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Metallic.io

Metallic.io

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
NTT DATA, Inc.

NTT DATA, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Metallic.io company and NTT DATA, Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Metallic.io company and NTT DATA, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Metallic.io company and NTT DATA, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Metallic.io company and NTT DATA, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Metallic.io company and NTT DATA, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Metallic.io company and NTT DATA, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Metallic.io company and NTT DATA, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Metallic.io company and NTT DATA, Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Metallic.io company and NTT DATA, Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Metallic.io company and NTT DATA, Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Metallic.io company and NTT DATA, Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Metallic.io and NTT DATA, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Metallic.io and NTT DATA, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Metallic.io or NTT DATA, Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Metallic.io or NTT DATA, Inc. ?
Between Metallic.io and NTT DATA, Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Metallic.io and NTT DATA, Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES