Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbHmetafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH
VS
GFT TechnologiesGFT Technologies
metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH

metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH

Leopoldstraße 146, Munich, 80804, DE

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://metafinanz.de/
755/1000Fair

For over 35 years, metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH, a business and IT consulting company, has been at the side of its customers in an increasingly digital and dynamic world. Our promise: We shine a new light on future viability. We enable our customers to find, deve...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:785
Subsidiaries:95
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GFT Technologies

GFT Technologies

Schelmenwasenstr. 34, Stuttgart, 70567, DE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.gft.com
751/1000Fair

GFT Technologies is an AI-centric global digital transformation company. We design advanced data and AI transformation solutions, modernize technology architectures and develop next-generation core systems for industry leaders in Banking, Insurance, Manufacturing and Ro...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:13,147
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH

metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GFT Technologies

GFT Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GFT Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GFT Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GFT Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH

metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GFT Technologies

GFT Technologies

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH company and GFT Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH company and GFT Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH company and GFT Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH company and GFT Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH company and GFT Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH and GFT Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH and GFT Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH or GFT Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH or GFT Technologies ?
Between metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH and GFT Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH and GFT Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9754
SUMMARY

An authenticated user with the read role may read limited amounts of uninitialized stack memory via specially-crafted issuances of the filemd5 command

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-09
UPDATED
Date2026-06-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-9753
SUMMARY

The $_internalApplyOplogUpdate aggregation pipeline stage can be used to execute a document diff containing a malformed binary diff to return memory out-of-bounds or crash the server. $_internalApplyOplogUpdate can be executed by any authenticated user with access to the aggregate command.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-09
UPDATED
Date2026-06-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-9752
SUMMARY

An authorized user could trigger a server crash by running a query with a 2dsphere index on a field that stores a GeoJSON GeometryCollection containing a Polygon with a strict-winding CRS. Strict-winding polygons are intentionally unsupported for indexing, but the guard that rejects them does not inspect members of a GeometryCollection, allowing the unsafe path to be reached which ends with an ensuing null-pointer dereference.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-09
UPDATED
Date2026-06-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-9751
SUMMARY

The ldapQueryPassword parameter, when set through the runtime setParameter command, will log the new password to the mongod.log file in plain text.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-09
UPDATED
Date2026-06-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-9750
SUMMARY

An authenticated user can cause a MongoDB server to crash or return incorrect results by creating documents that interfere with internal metadata processing during query execution. This stems from insufficient separation between user-controlled document fields and internal metadata in certain execution paths.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-09
UPDATED
Date2026-06-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8