Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MetaGuru 逐鹿數位MetaGuru 逐鹿數位
VS
LinkedInLinkedIn
MetaGuru 逐鹿數位

MetaGuru 逐鹿數位

台北市內湖區內湖路一段514號2樓, 台北市, TW

Last Update: 20/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.metaguru.com.tw/
752/1000Fair

目前已有10多個國家、3,000多家知名客戶、百萬名使用者,都在使用逐鹿數位的產品。逐鹿數位提供高彈性的模組化服務,為企業打造基層核心;亦從企業管理系統延伸創新應用,為企業提供數位轉型戰略。

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:61
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
LinkedIn

LinkedIn

1000 W Maude, Sunnyvale, CA, US, 94085

Last Update: 18/06/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://careers.linkedin.com
768/1000Fair

Founded in 2003, LinkedIn connects the world's professionals to make them more productive and successful. With more than 1 billion members worldwide, including executives from every Fortune 500 company, LinkedIn is the world's largest professional network. The company h...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:23,908
Subsidiaries:38
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MetaGuru 逐鹿數位

MetaGuru 逐鹿數位

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
LinkedIn

LinkedIn

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MetaGuru 逐鹿數位 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

LinkedIn has 185.71% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - MetaGuru 逐鹿數位 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MetaGuru 逐鹿數位 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - LinkedIn (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LinkedIn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MetaGuru 逐鹿數位

MetaGuru 逐鹿數位

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
LinkedIn

LinkedIn

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
LIN1780863827
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
LINMIC1780539842
🔒 Incident : Breach
LIN1773246240

FAQ

Between MetaGuru 逐鹿數位 company and LinkedIn company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MetaGuru 逐鹿數位 company and LinkedIn company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MetaGuru 逐鹿數位 company and LinkedIn company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MetaGuru 逐鹿數位 company and LinkedIn company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MetaGuru 逐鹿數位 company and LinkedIn company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MetaGuru 逐鹿數位 company and LinkedIn company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MetaGuru 逐鹿數位 company and LinkedIn company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MetaGuru 逐鹿數位 company and LinkedIn company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MetaGuru 逐鹿數位 company and LinkedIn company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MetaGuru 逐鹿數位 company and LinkedIn company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MetaGuru 逐鹿數位 company and LinkedIn company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MetaGuru 逐鹿數位 and LinkedIn, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MetaGuru 逐鹿數位 and LinkedIn, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MetaGuru 逐鹿數位 or LinkedIn ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MetaGuru 逐鹿數位 or LinkedIn ?
Between MetaGuru 逐鹿數位 and LinkedIn, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MetaGuru 逐鹿數位 and LinkedIn, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA