Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Mercantil RodriguesMercantil Rodrigues
VS
Ulta BeautyUlta Beauty
Mercantil Rodrigues

Mercantil Rodrigues

10 Travessa Frederico Pontes, None, Salvador, Bahia, BR, 40460

Last Update: 29/10/2025

View Profile
772/1000Fair

Mercantil Rodrigues is a Facilities Services company located in 10 Travessa Frederico Pontes, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:540
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ulta Beauty

Ulta Beauty

1000 Remington Blvd, Bolingbrook, 60440, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.ulta.com/
813/1000Good

At Ulta Beauty (NASDAQ: ULTA), the possibilities are beautiful. Ulta Beauty is the largest U.S. beauty retailer and the premier beauty destination for cosmetics, fragrance, skin care products, hair care products and salon services. In 1990, the Company reinvented the be...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:38,390
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Mercantil Rodrigues

Mercantil Rodrigues

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ulta Beauty

Ulta Beauty

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mercantil Rodrigues in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ulta Beauty in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Mercantil Rodrigues (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mercantil Rodrigues cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ulta Beauty (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ulta Beauty cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Mercantil Rodrigues

Mercantil Rodrigues

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ulta Beauty

Ulta Beauty

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Mercantil Rodrigues company and Ulta Beauty company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Mercantil Rodrigues company and Ulta Beauty company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Mercantil Rodrigues company and Ulta Beauty company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Mercantil Rodrigues company and Ulta Beauty company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Mercantil Rodrigues company and Ulta Beauty company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Mercantil Rodrigues company and Ulta Beauty company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Mercantil Rodrigues company and Ulta Beauty company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Mercantil Rodrigues company and Ulta Beauty company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Mercantil Rodrigues company and Ulta Beauty company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Mercantil Rodrigues company and Ulta Beauty company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Mercantil Rodrigues company and Ulta Beauty company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Mercantil Rodrigues and Ulta Beauty, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Mercantil Rodrigues and Ulta Beauty, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Mercantil Rodrigues or Ulta Beauty ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Mercantil Rodrigues or Ulta Beauty ?
Between Mercantil Rodrigues and Ulta Beauty, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Mercantil Rodrigues and Ulta Beauty, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1