Comparison Overview
Mercadona

Mercadona
Calle Alfonso Roig Alfonso, Albalat dels Sorells, 46135, ES
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Mercadona is a leading company of physical supermarkets in Spain with an online service, with over 1,610 stores and more than 5.9 million households as customers. Additionally, it has 60 stores in Portugal, with a presence in nine different districts. A family-owned co...

Coppel
República 2855 pte, Recursos Hidráulicos, Culiacan, Sinaloa, MX, 80105
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Coppel es una empresa mexicana con sede en la ciudad de Culiacán, que ha sido fundada en 1941. Es una cadena comercial de tiendas departamentales de ventas a través del otorgamiento de créditos con pocos requisitos, y repartos gratuitos. En la actualidad cuenta con mas ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Mercadona







Coppel






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Mercadona in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Coppel in 2026.
Incident History - Mercadona (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mercadona cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Coppel (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Coppel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Mercadona

Coppel
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.