Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Menath Insurance, an Alera Group CompanyMenath Insurance, an Alera Group Company
VS
AXAAXA
Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company

Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company

333 Village Blvd STE 203, Incline Village, 89451, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.menath.com
752/1000Fair

Who We Are... Menath Insurance is an Independent Insurance Agent located in the Lake Tahoe and Reno area and serving most Western states. We offer excellent personal service with competitive products and pricing. We will take the time to listen to your needs and find th...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:21
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AXA

AXA

25, avenue Matignon, Paris, 75008, FR

Last Update: 04/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.axa.com
807/1000Good

As one of the largest global insurers, our purpose is to act for human progress by protecting what matters. Protection has always been at the core of our business, helping individuals, businesses and societies to thrive. And AXA has always been a leader, an innovator, ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:141,854
Subsidiaries:41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company

Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AXA

AXA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AXA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AXA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AXA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company

Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AXA

AXA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AXA12312222

FAQ

Between Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company company and AXA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company company and AXA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company company and AXA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company company and AXA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company company and AXA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company company and AXA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company company and AXA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company company and AXA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company company and AXA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company company and AXA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company company and AXA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company and AXA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company and AXA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company or AXA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company or AXA ?
Between Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company and AXA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Menath Insurance, an Alera Group Company and AXA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA