Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Menard OceaniaMenard Oceania
VS
GHDGHD
Menard Oceania

Menard Oceania

13-15 Lyon Park Rd, Macquarie Park, NSW, 2113, AU

Last Update: 26/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.menardoceania.com.au
754/1000Fair

Menard Oceania is a design and construct specialist geotechnical contractor offering expertise in ground improvement for sites with poor soils. In other words, we treat the ground and make it strong again so that you can undertake your construction projects on solid f...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:83
Subsidiaries:123
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GHD

GHD

133 Castlereagh St, Sydney, 2000, AU

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ghd.com
790/1000Fair

We are committed to addressing the world’s biggest challenges in the areas of water, energy and communities. GHD is a global network of multi-disciplinary professionals providing clients with integrated solutions through engineering, environmental, design and construct...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:16,813
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Menard Oceania

Menard Oceania

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GHD

GHD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Menard Oceania in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GHD in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Menard Oceania (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Menard Oceania cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GHD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GHD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Menard Oceania

Menard Oceania

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GHD

GHD

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Menard Oceania company and GHD company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Menard Oceania company and GHD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Menard Oceania company and GHD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Menard Oceania company and GHD company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Menard Oceania company and GHD company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Menard Oceania company and GHD company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Menard Oceania company and GHD company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Menard Oceania company and GHD company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Menard Oceania company and GHD company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Menard Oceania company and GHD company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Menard Oceania company and GHD company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Menard Oceania and GHD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Menard Oceania and GHD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Menard Oceania or GHD ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Menard Oceania or GHD ?
Between Menard Oceania and GHD, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Menard Oceania and GHD, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
REFERENCES