Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Melcher & Prescott InsuranceMelcher & Prescott Insurance
VS
Progressive InsuranceProgressive Insurance
Melcher & Prescott Insurance

Melcher & Prescott Insurance

426 Main Street, Laconia, 03246, US

Last Update: 21/03/2026

View Profile
678/1000Weak

Established and locally owned since 1862, the Melcher and Prescott Insurance Agency is a full-service independent insurance agent, broker, and consultant. We specialize in employee benefits, business, and personal insurance with three offices located in Laconia and Mere...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:45
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Progressive Insurance

Progressive Insurance

300 North Commons Blvd, Mayfield Village, 44143, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
653/1000Weak

Every journey has a beginning, and wherever you are on your career path, we want to help you along the way. At Progressive, we exist to help people move forward and live fully. We strive to create a welcoming and flexible work environment for everyone, where employees ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:44,203
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Melcher & Prescott Insurance

Melcher & Prescott Insurance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Progressive Insurance

Progressive Insurance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Melcher & Prescott Insurance in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Progressive Insurance in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Melcher & Prescott Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Melcher & Prescott Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Progressive Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Progressive Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Melcher & Prescott Insurance

Melcher & Prescott Insurance

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MEL1767283191
Progressive Insurance

Progressive Insurance

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PRO3292632101525
🔒 Incident : Breach
PRO1014090725

FAQ

Between Melcher & Prescott Insurance company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Melcher & Prescott Insurance company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Melcher & Prescott Insurance company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Melcher & Prescott Insurance company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Melcher & Prescott Insurance company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Melcher & Prescott Insurance company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Melcher & Prescott Insurance company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Melcher & Prescott Insurance company and Progressive Insurance company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Melcher & Prescott Insurance company and Progressive Insurance company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Melcher & Prescott Insurance company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Melcher & Prescott Insurance company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Melcher & Prescott Insurance and Progressive Insurance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Melcher & Prescott Insurance and Progressive Insurance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Melcher & Prescott Insurance or Progressive Insurance ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Melcher & Prescott Insurance or Progressive Insurance ?
Between Melcher & Prescott Insurance and Progressive Insurance, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Melcher & Prescott Insurance and Progressive Insurance, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2