Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Melbourne PolytechnicMelbourne Polytechnic
VS
The University of AlabamaThe University of Alabama
Melbourne Polytechnic

Melbourne Polytechnic

Preston Campus, 77 St Georges Road, Preston, VICTORIA, AU, 3072

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
763/1000Fair

Melbourne Polytechnic has been delivering practical and professional education to the northern suburbs of Melbourne for over 100 years. From NMIT, Preston College of TAFE, Collingwood College of TAFE, Northern Metropolitan College of TAFE, to our beginnings as Collingwo...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:1,453
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
The University of Alabama

The University of Alabama

739 University Blvd, Tuscaloosa, al, US, 35487-0166

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://ua.edu
797/1000Fair

The University of Alabama is a student-centered research university and an academic community committed to enhancing the quality of life for all through breakthrough research. Founded in 1831 as Alabama's first public college, The University of Alabama is dedicated to...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:12,997
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Melbourne Polytechnic

Melbourne Polytechnic

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The University of Alabama

The University of Alabama

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Melbourne Polytechnic in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The University of Alabama in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Melbourne Polytechnic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Melbourne Polytechnic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The University of Alabama (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The University of Alabama cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Melbourne Polytechnic

Melbourne Polytechnic

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
MEL2312221222
The University of Alabama

The University of Alabama

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
THE15227323

FAQ

Between Melbourne Polytechnic company and The University of Alabama company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic company and The University of Alabama company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic company and The University of Alabama company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic company and The University of Alabama company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic company and The University of Alabama company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic company and The University of Alabama company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic company and The University of Alabama company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic company and The University of Alabama company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic company and The University of Alabama company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic company and The University of Alabama company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic company and The University of Alabama company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic and The University of Alabama, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic and The University of Alabama, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Melbourne Polytechnic or The University of Alabama ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Melbourne Polytechnic or The University of Alabama ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic and The University of Alabama, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic and The University of Alabama, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8