Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil)Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil)
VS
FugroFugro
Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil)

Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil)

77 St Georges Rd, Preston, 3072, AU

Last Update: 14/02/2026

View Profile

Melbourne Polytechnic's Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil) incorporates a Work Integrated Learning program that will equip you with the skills, knowledge and confidence to gain valuable industry experience with our key industry partners.

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Fugro

Fugro

Veurse Achterweg 10, Leidschendam, 2264 SG, NL

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fugro.com
784/1000Fair

We are the world’s leading Geo-data specialist, collecting and analysing comprehensive information about the Earth and the structures built upon it. Through integrated data acquisition, analysis and advice, we unlock insights from Geo-data to help our clients design, bu...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:10,678
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil)

Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Fugro

Fugro

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fugro in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Fugro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fugro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil)

Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Fugro

Fugro

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil) company and Fugro company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil) company and Fugro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil) company and Fugro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil) company and Fugro company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil) company and Fugro company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil) company and Fugro company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil) company and Fugro company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil) company and Fugro company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil) company and Fugro company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil) company and Fugro company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil) company and Fugro company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil) and Fugro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil) and Fugro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil) or Fugro ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil) or Fugro ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil) and Fugro, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Melbourne Polytechnic Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil) and Fugro, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2