Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize GroupMEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group
VS
InditexInditex
MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group

MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group

Bld. Timisoara, nr. 26, Bucuresti, Sector 6, undefined, undefined, RO

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mega-image.ro
778/1000Fair

Noi suntem MEGA IMAGE, brandul de supermarket care te inspiră să trăiești așa cum îți place Facem parte din Grupul Ahold Delhaize, retailer internațional ce operează în prezent în Europa, Statele Unite și Asia. În România, suntem unul dintre cele mai mari lanțuri de sup...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:2,586
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Inditex

Inditex

Avda. de la Diputación s/n, Arteixo, 15143, ES

Last Update: 09/08/2026

View Profile
723/1000Moderate

What is Inditex? Inditex comprises seven brands: Zara, Pull&Bear, Massimo Dutti, Bershka, Stradivarius, Oysho and Zara Home. We sell in 213 markets through our online platforms and our over 5.800 stores. But… What is Inditex? We are the clothes you choose to wear, th...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:75,209
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group

MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Inditex

Inditex

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

Inditex has 288.35% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Inditex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Inditex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group

MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Inditex

Inditex

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
INDPITCARBASZARHAL1777466463
🔒 Incident : Breach
CARHOLPRI1776630318
🔒 Incident : Breach
ZARIND1776328376

FAQ

Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Inditex company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Inditex company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Inditex company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Inditex company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Inditex company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Inditex company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Inditex company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Inditex company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Inditex company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Inditex company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Inditex company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group and Inditex, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group and Inditex, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group or Inditex ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group or Inditex ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group and Inditex, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group and Inditex, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66591
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in David Lingren Media LIbrary Assistant allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Media LIbrary Assistant: from n/a through 3.39.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-66589
SUMMARY

Missing Authorization vulnerability in Kings Plugins B2BKing allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects B2BKing: from n/a through 5.2.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-27365
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in PublishPress PublishPress Series allows Stored XSS. This issue affects PublishPress Series: from n/a through 2.17.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-73974
SUMMARY

linuxfabrik-lib provides Python modules for database access, caching, shell execution, and API integrations, and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins uses its shared testing helper across check plugins. Prior to linuxfabrik-lib 6.1.0 and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins 7.0.0, lib.lftest.test() treated the first or second element of a --test CSV argument as a filesystem path and returned the file contents as simulated standard output or standard error without path confinement. The hidden but production-accessible --test argument was accepted by sudo-authorized plugins, so an attacker controlling the nagios or icinga account could use check-plugins/deb-updates/deb-updates with its default QUERY=1 to disclose every line of a root-readable file. Approximately 22 other plugins exposed filtered content or a root file existence and readability oracle through the same helper, while check-plugins/network-bonding/network-bonding and check-plugins/openstack-swift-stat/openstack-swift-stat had direct read paths that bypassed the helper. The library fix confines fixture reads to the invoking plugin's unit-test directory and refuses unsafe anchors, and the plugin fix routes the two bypasses through that helper. These issues are fixed in linuxfabrik-lib 6.1.0 and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins 7.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-73973
SUMMARY

Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins provides monitoring plugins for Icinga, Nagios, and related systems. Prior to version 7.0.0, check-plugins/logfile/logfile accepted a free-form --filename path and opened it as root when invoked through the shipped nagios or icinga sudoers allowlist, without confining the resolved path to /var/log. An attacker who controls the monitoring account can select a root-readable file such as /etc/shadow and use --warning-regex . while leaving SUPPRESS_OUTPUT false, causing each nonempty line to be collected in warn_matches and returned through lib.base.oao(). The vulnerable flow passes the expanded scan_path directly to open(), and neither real-path containment nor an allowlist protects the sink. The same fix also confines mysql-logfile and openvpn-client-list paths, allows only documented log roots, and resolves symlinks and parent-directory traversal before checking containment. This issue is fixed in version 7.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8