Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize GroupMEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group
VS
BelkBelk
MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group

MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group

Bld. Timisoara, nr. 26, Bucuresti, Sector 6, undefined, undefined, RO

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mega-image.ro
778/1000Fair

Noi suntem MEGA IMAGE, brandul de supermarket care te inspiră să trăiești așa cum îți place Facem parte din Grupul Ahold Delhaize, retailer internațional ce operează în prezent în Europa, Statele Unite și Asia. În România, suntem unul dintre cele mai mari lanțuri de sup...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:2,586
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Belk

Belk

2801 W Tyvola Rd, Charlotte, 28217, US

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.belkcareers.com/
687/1000Weak

Charlotte-based Belk, Inc., a privately-owned department store, began when William Henry Belk opened his first store in 1888 with his brother, Dr. John Belk, joining as a partner. What started as two brothers in business has now grown into a legacy of selling great prod...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:12,732
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group

MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Belk

Belk

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Belk in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Belk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Belk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group

MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Belk

Belk

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
BELMAR1770616665

FAQ

Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Belk company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Belk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Belk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Belk company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Belk company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Belk company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Belk company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Belk company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Belk company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Belk company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Belk company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group and Belk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group and Belk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group or Belk ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group or Belk ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group and Belk, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group and Belk, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89322
SUMMARY

Vault and Vault Enterprise did not consistently evaluate ACL policies against the canonical form of resource and policy names. This may allow an authenticated user with delegated permissions to bypass an explicit deny restriction and access a protected resource or assign a denied policy, potentially leading to privilege escalation. This vulnerability (CVE-2026-89322) is fixed in Vault Community Edition 2.1.2, and Vault Enterprise 2.1.2, 1.21.12, 1.20.17, and 1.19.23.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-107314
SUMMARY

pgjdbc, the PostgreSQL JDBC Driver, versions 42.7.11 through 42.7.13 enforce no restriction when the requireAuth connection property excludes all six authentication methods the driver knows, for example requireAuth=!password,!md5,!gss,!sspi,!scram-sha-256,!none. The driver then accepts any method the server asks for, including cleartext password authentication. A value without a method in it, such as requireAuth=, (a single comma), is affected the same way. An attacker positioned between the application and its server can ask for cleartext password authentication and receive the database password. A positive list such as requireAuth=scram-sha-256, and a partial exclusion such as requireAuth=!password,!md5, are enforced correctly. The property has no default value, so a deployment that does not set it is not affected. 42.7.14 fixes the problem: such a connection is refused with SQLState 08004, and a value without a method in it is rejected as invalid.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107285
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, a proxied ws request is carried through CONNECT, but NettyRequestFactory.newNettyRequest and requestUri decide whether to attach proxy authentication and an absolute-form target only from whether the URI is secure. Because ws is not marked secure, the tunneled WebSocket upgrade sent to the origin includes the proxy's Proxy-Authorization value. Basic credentials are directly recoverable and Digest responses can be replayed or cracked offline. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107284
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, WebSocketHandler.upgrade aborts a handshake whose Sec-WebSocket-Accept value is missing or invalid but continues into pipeline installation and onOpen delivery. Frames coalesced with the invalid 101 response can be decoded and delivered from a peer that did not prove the handshake, although the request future fails and the channel closes. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107283
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, Realm.Builder generates the HTTP Digest client nonce with ThreadLocalRandom rather than a cryptographically secure random source. Digest relies on an unpredictable cnonce to resist chosen-plaintext and credential precomputation attacks, so an observer able to infer generator state can reduce the protection of the authentication exchange. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2