Meetliquid vs Erm - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Comparison Overview

LIQUID

ERM

LIQUID

undefined, Lima, Lima, Lima 27, PE

Last Update: 15/04/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

http://www.meetliquid.com

751/1000Fair

LIQUID es un hub de innovación y transformación apalancado en el diseño estratégico, la tecnología y el emprendimiento. Buscamos generar crecimiento sostenible en mercados emergentes a través de la aceleración y la creación de negocios (Diseño Estratégico + Tecnología...

NAICS:541

NAICS Definition:N/A

Employees:122

Subsidiaries:0

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

ERM

33 St Mary Axe, London, GB, EC3A 8AA

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

http://www.erm.com

784/1000Fair

Sustainability is our business.  As the world’s largest specialist sustainability consultancy, ERM partners with clients to operationalize sustainability at pace and scale, deploying a unique combination of strategic transformation and technical delivery capabilities....

NAICS:5416

NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services

Employees:10,575

Subsidiaries:7

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category

LIQUID

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

ERM

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LIQUID in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ERM in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - LIQUID (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LIQUID cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ERM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ERM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...

LIQUID

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

ERM

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between LIQUID company and ERM company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between LIQUID company and ERM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between LIQUID company and ERM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between LIQUID company and ERM company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between LIQUID company and ERM company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between LIQUID company and ERM company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between LIQUID company and ERM company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between LIQUID company and ERM company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between LIQUID company and ERM company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between LIQUID company and ERM company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between LIQUID company and ERM company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between LIQUID and ERM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between LIQUID and ERM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LIQUID or ERM ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LIQUID or ERM ?

Between LIQUID and ERM, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between LIQUID and ERM, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-76929

SUMMARY

Pcapng file parser crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76928

SUMMARY

X.509IF protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76927

SUMMARY

H.245 protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76926

SUMMARY

BUSMASTER file parser abnormal exit in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.1)

CVSS3

Base Score: 3.1

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

1.4

EXPLOITABILITY

1.6

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76924

SUMMARY

Kerberos protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 5.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

1.8

REFERENCES