Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Medline JapanMedline Japan
VS
Beckman Coulter DiagnosticsBeckman Coulter Diagnostics
Medline Japan

Medline Japan

Koishikawa 1-4-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 112-0002, JP

Last Update: 20/03/2026

View Profile
758/1000Fair

半世紀にわたり、医療の最前線を支え続けて― 私たちメドライン・ジャパンは、 米国最大規模のトータルメディカルサプライヤ-、メドライン社の日本法人です。 急性期病院や手術センター、介護施設、在宅介護業者などの医療現場に向け、 これまで多岐にわたる医療製品を製造・販売。 その製品とサービスは、全米の主要な医療機関で認められ、 現在は世界30ヵ国以上の国々で愛用されています。 世界の医療現場でおよそ半世紀にわたって培われてきた品質と安全性を、日本の医療現場へ―。 私たちのこれからの活躍にぜひご期待ください。 ...

NAICS:339
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:45
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Beckman Coulter Diagnostics

Beckman Coulter Diagnostics

250 S Kraemer Blvd, Brea, California, US, 92821

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
788/1000Fair

A global leader in advanced diagnostics, Beckman Coulter has challenged convention to elevate the diagnostic laboratory’s role in improving patient health for more than 80 years. Our mission is to Relentlessly Reimagine Healthcare, One Diagnosis at a Time – and we do th...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:10,608
Subsidiaries:67
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Medline Japan

Medline Japan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Beckman Coulter Diagnostics

Beckman Coulter Diagnostics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Medline Japan in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beckman Coulter Diagnostics in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Medline Japan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Medline Japan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Beckman Coulter Diagnostics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beckman Coulter Diagnostics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Medline Japan

Medline Japan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Beckman Coulter Diagnostics

Beckman Coulter Diagnostics

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Medline Japan company and Beckman Coulter Diagnostics company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Medline Japan company and Beckman Coulter Diagnostics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Medline Japan company and Beckman Coulter Diagnostics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Medline Japan company and Beckman Coulter Diagnostics company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Medline Japan company and Beckman Coulter Diagnostics company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Medline Japan company and Beckman Coulter Diagnostics company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Medline Japan company and Beckman Coulter Diagnostics company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Medline Japan company and Beckman Coulter Diagnostics company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Medline Japan company and Beckman Coulter Diagnostics company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Medline Japan company and Beckman Coulter Diagnostics company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Medline Japan company and Beckman Coulter Diagnostics company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Medline Japan and Beckman Coulter Diagnostics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Medline Japan and Beckman Coulter Diagnostics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Medline Japan or Beckman Coulter Diagnostics ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Medline Japan or Beckman Coulter Diagnostics ?
Between Medline Japan and Beckman Coulter Diagnostics, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Medline Japan and Beckman Coulter Diagnostics, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2