Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Medium

Medium Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

greenhouse.io

At Medium, we believe in the power of words — and we’re on a mission to bring the world’s expertise to life through memorable storytelling. Our platform rewards great writing and puts power back in the hands of readers. Medium’s subscription model means we rely on our members, not ads. We’re looking for teammates who are inspired by our mission, who are deeply thoughtful and empathetic, and who are passionate about the future of online publishing. Sound like you? Keep reading!


Medium A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Medium
Company Information
Website:https://job-boards.greenhouse.io/medium
Employees number:9,820
Number of followers:210,919
NAICS:51913
Industry Type:Internet Publishing
Homepage:greenhouse.io
Medium Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
logo
MediumInternet Publishing
Updated:
08/05/2026
745/1000
Moderate
Ba
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Medium Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
MediumInternet Publishing
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Medium
MediumModerate
Current Score
745Ba (MODERATE)
01000
2 incidents
-19 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JULY 2026
747Before Incident
JUNE 2026
747Before Incident
MAY 2026
745Before Incident
APRIL 2026
745Before Incident
MARCH 2026
744Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
763Before Incident
Cyber Attack
14 Feb 2026Medium
Anthropic, Google, Medium and Apple: Malicious Campaign Uses Claude Artifacts and Google Ads to Deliver macOS Malware

Sophisticated macOS Malware Campaign Exploits Google Ads, Claude AI, and Medium to Distribute MacSync Stealer

742After Incident
CRITICAL-21
ANTGOOAPPMED1771064819
Sophisticated macOS Malware Campaign Exploits Google Ads, Claude AI, and Medium to Distribute MacSync Stealer A recent malware campaign is targeting macOS users through a multi-pronged attack leveraging sponsored Google search results, Claude AI’s public artifact feature, and fraudulent Medium articles. The operation, uncovered by cybersecurity researchers at Moonlock Lab, has exposed over 15,000 users to the MacSync information stealer, which siphons sensitive data including keychain credentials, browser data, and cryptocurrency wallets. The campaign employs two distinct variants, both using the ClickFix social engineering technique to deceive users into executing malicious commands. ### First Variant: Fake DNS Resolver via Claude AI When users search for "Online DNS resolver" on Google, a sponsored result directs them to a public Claude AI artifact titled "macOS Secure Command Execution." The fake guide masquerades as a legitimate security tool, instructing victims to paste a base64-encoded command into their Terminal. Upon execution, the command downloads a loader for MacSync from `/tmp/osalogging.zip`, which then establishes communication with a command-and-control (C2) server at `a2abotnet[.]com/dynamic`. The malware uses a hardcoded authentication token and API key, spoofs a macOS browser User-Agent string to evade detection, and exfiltrates stolen data via Apple’s `osascript` utility. Larger datasets are uploaded in chunks with retry mechanisms and exponential backoff to ensure successful transmission. After exfiltration, the malware deletes staging files to cover its tracks. ### Second Variant: Fake Disk Space Analyzer via Medium A second attack vector targets users searching for "macOS CLI disk space analyzer" through a fraudulent Medium article hosted at `apple-mac-disk-space.medium[.]com`. The article impersonates Apple’s official Support Team and delivers a similar ClickFix payload with additional obfuscation, including string concatenation tricks (e.g., `cur””l`) to bypass detection. The malicious payload is fetched from `raxelpak[.]com`. ### Evasion Tactics and Broader Implications The threat actors behind this campaign demonstrate a deep understanding of social engineering and evasion techniques, exploiting trusted platforms like Google Ads, Claude AI, and Medium to lend legitimacy to their attacks. By abusing these services, they bypass traditional security controls and reach a broader audience. The MacSync stealer remains a persistent threat, with its operators continuously refining their methods to avoid detection while maximizing data theft. The campaign underscores the growing trend of malware distributors leveraging legitimate services to propagate malicious payloads.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Malware Campaign
MOTIVATION
Data Theft
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Keychain credentials, browser data, cryptocurrency walletsSystems Affected: macOS systemsIdentity Theft Risk: HighPayment Information Risk: High
DATA BREACH
Keychain credentialsBrowser dataCryptocurrency walletsNumber Of Records Exposed: 15,000+Sensitivity Of Data: High
JANUARY 2026
763Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
762Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
778Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 Nov 2025Medium
Squarespace, Medium, Apple and Craft: Fake macOS Troubleshooting Sites Used to Steal iCloud Data in ClickFix Scam

New ClickFix Social Engineering Campaign Targets macOS Users with Fake Troubleshooting Guides

761After Incident
HIGH-17
SQUNODMEDAPP1778279131
New ClickFix Social Engineering Campaign Targets macOS Users with Fake Troubleshooting Guides Microsoft’s Defender Security Research Team has uncovered a sophisticated cyberattack campaign leveraging a social engineering tactic called ClickFix to compromise Apple computers. Active since late 2025 and continuing into early 2026, the campaign tricks users into executing malicious commands under the guise of legitimate troubleshooting solutions. Attackers distribute fake guides on platforms like Medium, Craft, and Squarespace, offering fixes for common issues such as disk space errors or system malfunctions. Instead of providing downloads, these sites instruct users to copy and paste commands into macOS Terminal, claiming they are system utilities or quick repairs. The guides are often multilingual and appear on websites that have since been taken down or reported. Once executed, the commands bypass macOS security features like Gatekeeper, which typically only scans app bundles and disk images not direct Terminal inputs. The malware including AMOS (Atomic macOS Stealer), Macsync, and SHub Stealer then prompts users to enter their system password under the pretense of installing a "helper tool." If granted, attackers gain full access to sensitive files, settings, and credentials. The malware targets a range of high-value data, including: - iCloud and Telegram account credentials - Private documents, notes, and photos under 2 MB - Cryptocurrency wallet keys (Exodus, Ledger, Trezor) - Saved browser passwords (Chrome, Firefox) - Authentic crypto apps, which attackers replace with trojanized versions to monitor transactions and steal funds The campaign employs fileless attack techniques, using tools like curl and osascript to run malware directly in memory, evading traditional antivirus detection. Microsoft also identified a kill switch in the malware that halts execution if a Russian keyboard layout is detected. In response, Apple has introduced a security feature in macOS 26.4, which now displays a "Possible malware, Paste blocked" warning when users attempt to paste suspicious commands into Terminal. The update aims to mitigate the risk of unintentional execution of malicious scripts.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Social Engineering, Malware
MOTIVATION
Data theft, financial gain, credential harvesting
IMPACT
Data Compromised: iCloud and Telegram credentials, private documents, cryptocurrency wallet keys, browser passwordsSystems Affected: macOS systemsOperational Impact: Unauthorized access to sensitive files and settingsBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage to Apple due to security bypassIdentity Theft Risk: High (credentials and personal data compromised)Payment Information Risk: High (cryptocurrency wallet keys and browser passwords compromised)
DATA BREACH
CredentialsPersonal documentsCryptocurrency wallet keysBrowser passwordsSensitivity Of Data: HighData Exfiltration: YesData Encryption: No (malware bypasses encryption via direct access)DocumentsPhotos (<2 MB)Browser dataCryptocurrency wallet filesPersonally Identifiable Information: Yes (iCloud/Telegram credentials, browser passwords)
OCTOBER 2025
778Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
778Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
778Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Medium ?
?
What was Medium's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was Medium's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Medium's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Medium's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Medium's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Medium's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Medium's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Medium's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Medium's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Medium's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Medium's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Medium's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Medium ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Medium's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?