Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TÜV NORD MEDITÜVTÜV NORD MEDITÜV
VS
AscensionAscension
TÜV NORD MEDITÜV

TÜV NORD MEDITÜV

Am TÜV, Hannover, Niedersachsen, 30519, DE

Last Update: 27/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.medituev.de
761/1000Fair

MEDITÜV ist der Qualitätsdienstleister im überbetrieblichen Arbeitsschutz. Wir bieten alle Dienstleistungen rund um den gesunden Arbeitsplatz und Mitarbeitenden. Betriebsärzte und Fachkräfte für Arbeitssicherheit beraten gemeinsam mit Gesundheitswissenschaftler und ABO-...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:41
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ascension

Ascension

101 South Hanley Rd., St. Louis, 63105, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.ascension.org/
100/1000Critical

Answering God's call to bring health, healing and hope to all. Ascension is one of the nation’s leading non-profit and Catholic health systems, with a Mission of delivering compassionate, personalized care to all, with special attention to those most vulnerable. In FY...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:66,548
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TÜV NORD MEDITÜV

TÜV NORD MEDITÜV

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ascension

Ascension

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TÜV NORD MEDITÜV in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Ascension has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - TÜV NORD MEDITÜV (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TÜV NORD MEDITÜV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ascension (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ascension cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TÜV NORD MEDITÜV

TÜV NORD MEDITÜV

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ascension

Ascension

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ASC1773764792
🔒 Incident : Breach
ASC220051225
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ASC000032225

FAQ

Between TÜV NORD MEDITÜV company and Ascension company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TÜV NORD MEDITÜV company and Ascension company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TÜV NORD MEDITÜV company and Ascension company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TÜV NORD MEDITÜV company and Ascension company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TÜV NORD MEDITÜV company and Ascension company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TÜV NORD MEDITÜV company and Ascension company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TÜV NORD MEDITÜV company and Ascension company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TÜV NORD MEDITÜV company and Ascension company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TÜV NORD MEDITÜV company and Ascension company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TÜV NORD MEDITÜV company and Ascension company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TÜV NORD MEDITÜV company and Ascension company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TÜV NORD MEDITÜV and Ascension, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TÜV NORD MEDITÜV and Ascension, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TÜV NORD MEDITÜV or Ascension ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TÜV NORD MEDITÜV or Ascension ?
Between TÜV NORD MEDITÜV and Ascension, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TÜV NORD MEDITÜV and Ascension, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA