Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Medici Senza FrontiereMedici Senza Frontiere
VS
Save the Children InternationalSave the Children International
Medici Senza Frontiere

Medici Senza Frontiere

via Magenta 5, Roma, 00185, IT

Last Update: 27/02/2026

View Profile
766/1000Fair

Ogni giorno curiamo migliaia di persone in tutto il mondo colpite da conflitti, epidemie, catastrofi naturali o escluse dall’assistenza sanitaria. Interveniamo dove c'è più bisogno di noi. Siamo medici, infermieri, esperti di logistica, amministratori, ingegneri, archit...

NAICS:8135
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:356
Subsidiaries:30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Save the Children International

Save the Children International

1 St. Johns Lane , London, England, GB, EC1M 4BL 

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
764/1000Fair

Save the Children Save the Children is the world's leading independent organisation for children. We work in around 120 countries. Our vision is to live in a world in which every child attains the right to survival, protection, development and participation. Last...

NAICS:8135
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:17,354
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Medici Senza Frontiere

Medici Senza Frontiere

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Save the Children International

Save the Children International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Medici Senza Frontiere in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Save the Children International in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Medici Senza Frontiere (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Medici Senza Frontiere cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Save the Children International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Save the Children International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Medici Senza Frontiere

Medici Senza Frontiere

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Save the Children International

Save the Children International

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SAV115717923

FAQ

Between Medici Senza Frontiere company and Save the Children International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Medici Senza Frontiere company and Save the Children International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Medici Senza Frontiere company and Save the Children International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Medici Senza Frontiere company and Save the Children International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Medici Senza Frontiere company and Save the Children International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Medici Senza Frontiere company and Save the Children International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Medici Senza Frontiere company and Save the Children International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Medici Senza Frontiere company and Save the Children International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Medici Senza Frontiere company and Save the Children International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Medici Senza Frontiere company and Save the Children International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Medici Senza Frontiere company and Save the Children International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Medici Senza Frontiere and Save the Children International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Medici Senza Frontiere and Save the Children International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Medici Senza Frontiere or Save the Children International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Medici Senza Frontiere or Save the Children International ?
Between Medici Senza Frontiere and Save the Children International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Medici Senza Frontiere and Save the Children International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1