Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Medicel AGMedicel AG
VS
Zimmer BiometZimmer Biomet
Medicel AG

Medicel AG

Dornierstrasse 11, Altenrhein, St. Gallen, 9423, CH

Last Update: 31/10/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.medicel.com/
758/1000Fair

Making eye surgery safer, simpler and more efficient - this was the core principle of Medicel AG since founded 1996 in Widnau, Switzerland. Since the successful market launch of the first injector in 1999, Medicel has continued to innovate. Medicel later became part of...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:53
Subsidiaries:71
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Zimmer Biomet

Zimmer Biomet

345 East Main Street, P.O. Box 708, Warsaw, Indiana, US, 46580

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.zimmerbiomet.com
799/1000Fair

Zimmer Biomet is a global medical technology leader with a comprehensive portfolio designed to maximize mobility and improve health. We advance our mission to alleviate pain and improve the quality of life for patients around the world with our innovative products and s...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:18,660
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Medicel AG

Medicel AG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Zimmer Biomet

Zimmer Biomet

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Medicel AG in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zimmer Biomet in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Medicel AG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Medicel AG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Zimmer Biomet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zimmer Biomet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Medicel AG

Medicel AG

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Zimmer Biomet

Zimmer Biomet

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Medicel AG company and Zimmer Biomet company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Medicel AG company and Zimmer Biomet company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Medicel AG company and Zimmer Biomet company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Medicel AG company and Zimmer Biomet company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Medicel AG company and Zimmer Biomet company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Medicel AG company and Zimmer Biomet company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Medicel AG company and Zimmer Biomet company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Medicel AG company and Zimmer Biomet company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Medicel AG company and Zimmer Biomet company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Medicel AG company and Zimmer Biomet company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Medicel AG company and Zimmer Biomet company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Medicel AG and Zimmer Biomet, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Medicel AG and Zimmer Biomet, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Medicel AG or Zimmer Biomet ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Medicel AG or Zimmer Biomet ?
Between Medicel AG and Zimmer Biomet, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Medicel AG and Zimmer Biomet, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2