Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MCIMCI
VS
KantarKantar
MCI

MCI

N/A

Last Update: 26/03/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

MCI is a healthcare market research agency in Japan. We provide insight and solutions to our client pharmaceutical companies through our consulting and marketing research services. We also partner with research agencies around the globe, providing expertise and support ...

NAICS:54191
NAICS Definition:Marketing Research and Public Opinion Polling
Employees:18
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Kantar

Kantar

6 More London Place, London, undefined, undefined, GB

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kantar.com
798/1000Fair

Kantar is the world’s leading marketing data and analytics company. . We have a complete, unique and rounded understanding of how people think, feel and act; globally and locally in over 90 markets. By combining the deep expertise of our people, our data resources and b...

NAICS:54191
NAICS Definition:Marketing Research and Public Opinion Polling
Employees:28,339
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MCI

MCI

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Kantar

Kantar

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Market Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MCI in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Market Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kantar in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MCI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MCI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Kantar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kantar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MCI

MCI

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Kantar

Kantar

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between MCI company and Kantar company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MCI company and Kantar company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MCI company and Kantar company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MCI company and Kantar company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MCI company and Kantar company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MCI company and Kantar company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MCI company and Kantar company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MCI company and Kantar company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MCI company and Kantar company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MCI company and Kantar company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MCI company and Kantar company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MCI and Kantar, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MCI and Kantar, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MCI or Kantar ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MCI or Kantar ?
Between MCI and Kantar, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MCI and Kantar, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-47238
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #133, a normal authenticated user can edit another user's video subtitles because of a lack of authorization. They can upload subtitles, edit their name or delete them. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #133.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-45418
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #132, any authenticated user who can upload videos can add multiple subtitles from different files and change their title (English, Spanish...). The POST /actions/subtitle_edit.php request used to change their title includes a number parameter which is vulnerable to SQL Injection. A boolean-based blind SQL injection can be used to exfiltrate sensitive data. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #132.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-45060
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #129, the actions/progress_video.php endpoint is vulnerable to blind SQL injection. Any unauthenticated user can exploit the ids parameter to execute SQL queries and exfiltrate sensitive data. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #129.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-42846
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #140, ClipBucket's Remote Play feature allows any authenticated user to add a video by importing an external URL as the source. Some shell commands are run with the URL as a parameter. The URL is concatenated directly into shell commands without escaping then executed, so any shell metacharacter in the URL is interpreted. This results in arbitrary command execution. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #140.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-6250
SUMMARY

An authenticated format string vulnerability exists in the ONVIF service of Tapo C110 v2 due to improper handling of user-controlled input.  Externally controlled data is interpreted as a format string, which can be used to manipulate stack memory, including control flow data such as return addresses. A remote authenticated attacker may redirect execution flow to existing internal functions, triggering an unauthorized factory reset, leading to loss of configuration, deletion of stored credentials and service disruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA