Company Details
medibank
3,712
56,069
524
medibank.com.au
0
MED_1116859
In-progress

Medibank Company CyberSecurity Posture
medibank.com.auAt Medibank we are motivated by improving the health of all Australians and the health of our members. We are passionate about building a better health system that is centred on people, and sustainable in the long term. Medibank’s core business is the underwriting and distribution of private health insurance policies through our two brands, Medibank and ahm. We also provide a range of integrated healthcare services to our private health insurance policyholders, government, corporate and other retail customers. Medibank’s headquarters are in Melbourne, Victoria, with operations throughout Australia.
Company Details
medibank
3,712
56,069
524
medibank.com.au
0
MED_1116859
In-progress
Between 0 and 549

Medibank Global Score (TPRM)XXXX

Description: Medibank, Australia's largest health insurer, has suffered a cybersecurity incident. It has led to a data breach of around 9.7 million of the company's customers and clients. They accessed data such as the name, date of birth, mailing address, phone number and email address of those affected, along with other information such as customer and credit card IDs, among others.
Description: Health insurer Medibank Private says it has been hit by a cyber attack. The company said "unusual activity" had been detected on its network on Wednesday, but there was no evidence sensitive data, including customer information, had been accessed. Some customer-facing systems have been taken down which will cause "regrettable disruptions" to some customers, but health services will still be available. It is the latest cyber attack after the Optus breach last month, which affected millions of customers.
Description: Medibank experienced a high-profile cyberattack where sensitive customer data, including personal and financial information, was compromised. This attack exposed the personal information of customers, leading to significant reputational damage and potential legal consequences for the company.
Description: Medibank, the Australian health insurance business targeted by the ransomware attack, attakers accessed its customers’ data. Ransomware did not encrypt Medibank's systems, but thieves frequently steal data to blackmail their victims. They investigated the incident and took actions to protect of their customers’ data very seriously.
Description: Medibank, one of Australia’s largest private health insurers, suffered a devastating **ransomware attack in 2022**, orchestrated by cybercriminals linked to **Aleksandr Ermakov**—a key figure sanctioned in the recent bulletproof hosting crackdown. The breach resulted in the **theft of sensitive personal and health data of 9.7 million current and former customers**, including names, addresses, dates of birth, Medicare numbers, and even **highly sensitive health claims data** (e.g., mental health, drug addiction, and abortion records). The attackers, affiliated with the **REvil ransomware group**, initially demanded a ransom, but Medibank refused to pay, leading to the **public dump of stolen data on the dark web**. The fallout was catastrophic: **class-action lawsuits**, regulatory investigations, and **irreparable reputational damage**. Customers faced **identity theft risks, blackmail attempts, and fraudulent activities** tied to their exposed data. The financial toll exceeded **$35–50 million AUD** in direct costs, including **remediation, legal fees, and customer compensation**, while the **long-term erosion of trust** led to **customer churn and market share decline**. The attack also triggered **government scrutiny over cybersecurity failures**, with Medibank’s CEO later stepping down. The incident remains one of Australia’s **worst data breaches**, exemplifying how ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) ecosystems, enabled by bulletproof hosting, can cripple critical infrastructure.
Description: Hackers managed to gain access to all of the Medibank's customers’ personal data. Medibank denied to pay ransom in hack that impacted 9.7 million current and former customers and some of their authorized representatives. The criminals accessed data including the name, date of birth, address, phone number and email address. The criminals are also believed to have accessed health claims data for 480,000 customers, including “codes associated with diagnosis and procedures administered.”


Medibank has 49.25% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Medibank has 56.25% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Medibank reported 1 incidents this year: 1 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 0 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
Medibank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

At Medibank we are motivated by improving the health of all Australians and the health of our members. We are passionate about building a better health system that is centred on people, and sustainable in the long term. Medibank’s core business is the underwriting and distribution of private health insurance policies through our two brands, Medibank and ahm. We also provide a range of integrated healthcare services to our private health insurance policyholders, government, corporate and other retail customers. Medibank’s headquarters are in Melbourne, Victoria, with operations throughout Australia.


Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan is a nonprofit corporation and an independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. BCBSM's commitment to Michigan is what differentiates it from other health insurance companies doing business in the state. That mission has never changed. Nea

Marsh McLennan Agency (MMA) provides business insurance, employee health & benefits, retirement & wealth, and private client insurance solutions to organizations and individuals seeking limitless possibilities. With over 15,000+ colleagues and 300+ offices across the United States and Canada, MMA co

Chubb is a world leader in insurance. With operations in 54 countries and territories, Chubb provides commercial and personal property and casualty insurance, personal accident and supplemental health insurance, reinsurance and life insurance to a diverse group of clients. As an underwriting company

At Liberty Mutual, we believe progress happens when people feel secure. For more than 110 years we have helped people and businesses embrace today and confidently pursue tomorrow by providing protection for the unexpected and delivering it with care. A Fortune 100 company with more than 40,000 e

Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance, one of the fastest-growing life insurers, is a joint venture between Bajaj Finserv Limited, one of the most diversified financial institutions in India, and Allianz SE, a leading global financial services provider with a presence in 70+ countries. Our remarkable journe

At MAPFRE, we’re committed to protecting what matters most to you. That’s why we’re the largest Spanish-owned insurer in the world, the largest multinational insurance company in Latin America and among the 15 largest European groups by premium volume. With a legacy spanning more than 90 years, we’r

Allianz Partners is a world leader in B2B2C insurance and assistance, offering global solutions that span international health and life, travel insurance, automotive and assistance. Customer driven, our innovative experts are redefining insurance services by delivering future-ready, high-tech high-t

Talanx is one of the major European insurance groups. Under the HDI brand it operates both in Germany and abroad in industrial insurance as well as retail business. Further Group brands include Hannover Re, one of the world’s leading reinsurers, Targo insurers, LifeStyle Protection and neue leben, t

What makes Lockton stand apart is also what makes us better: independence. Our private ownership empowers our 13,100+ Associates doing business in over 140+ countries to focus solely on clients' risk and insurance needs. With expertise that reaches around the globe, we deliver the deep understanding
.png)
The catastrophic data breaches that exposed millions of Australians' personal information at Medibank and Optus revealed a fundamental flaw...
The catastrophic data breaches that exposed millions of Australians' personal information at Medibank and Optus revealed a fundamental flaw...
A 2022 attack on health insurance provider Medibank was likely caused by a lack of multi-factor authentication.
A recent Federal Court decision in the Medibank data breach class action highlights the limits of legal professional privilege in respect of...
For only the second time ever, ASIC has taken enforcement action against the holder of an Australian Financial Services Licence alleging...
Medibank will have to hand up three post-incident reports by Deloitte into its massive October 2022 data breach, after a judge found the...
The government of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has imposed additional cyber sanctions in response to a major 2022 cyberattack that hit Medibank Private.
The Albanese Government has imposed additional cyber sanctions in response to the 2022 cyberattack against Medibank Private.
The Australian government has imposed new cyber sanctions against hosting platform ZServers and five Russian individuals who enabled a landmark 2022 data...

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
The official website of Medibank is https://www.medibank.com.au.
According to Rankiteo, Medibank’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 526, reflecting their Critical security posture.
According to Rankiteo, Medibank currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
According to Rankiteo, Medibank is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
According to Rankiteo, Medibank does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
According to Rankiteo, Medibank is not listed as GDPR compliant.
According to Rankiteo, Medibank does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
According to Rankiteo, Medibank is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
According to Rankiteo,Medibank is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Medibank operates primarily in the Insurance industry.
Medibank employs approximately 3,712 people worldwide.
Medibank presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Medibank’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 56,069 followers.
Medibank is classified under the NAICS code 524, which corresponds to Insurance Carriers and Related Activities.
No, Medibank does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Yes, Medibank maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/medibank.
As of December 04, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Medibank has experienced 6 cybersecurity incidents.
Medibank has an estimated 14,960 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Cyber Attack, Ransomware and Breach.
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an law enforcement notified with yes, and and third party assistance with u.s. treasury’s office of foreign assets control (ofac), third party assistance with u.k. foreign, commonwealth & development office, third party assistance with australian department of foreign affairs, and and containment measures with asset freezes, containment measures with travel bans, containment measures with business transaction prohibitions, and remediation measures with disruption of bulletproof hosting infrastructure, remediation measures with increased operational costs for ransomware actors, and communication strategy with public attribution of sanctioned entities, communication strategy with diplomatic messaging to encourage global coordination, and enhanced monitoring with persistent monitoring of bulletproof hosting providers, enhanced monitoring with collaboration with infrastructure providers and domain registrars..
Title: Medibank Ransomware Attack
Description: Medibank, the Australian health insurance business, was targeted by a ransomware attack where attackers accessed its customers’ data. The ransomware did not encrypt Medibank's systems, but thieves frequently steal data to blackmail their victims. Medibank investigated the incident and took actions to protect their customers’ data very seriously.
Type: Ransomware Attack
Motivation: Data Theft and Blackmail
Title: Medibank Private Cyber Attack
Description: Health insurer Medibank Private experienced a cyber attack with unusual activity detected on its network. No evidence of sensitive data access was found, but some customer-facing systems were taken down, causing disruptions.
Date Detected: Wednesday
Type: Cyber Attack
Title: Medibank Data Breach
Description: Hackers managed to gain access to all of Medibank's customers’ personal data. Medibank denied to pay ransom in hack that impacted 9.7 million current and former customers and some of their authorized representatives. The criminals accessed data including the name, date of birth, address, phone number and email address. The criminals are also believed to have accessed health claims data for 480,000 customers, including “codes associated with diagnosis and procedures administered.”
Type: Data Breach
Title: Medibank Data Breach
Description: Medibank, Australia's largest health insurer, has suffered a cybersecurity incident leading to a data breach of around 9.7 million of the company's customers and clients. They accessed data such as the name, date of birth, mailing address, phone number and email address of those affected, along with other information such as customer and credit card IDs, among others.
Type: Data Breach
Title: Australia Requires Ransomware Victims to Report Extortion Payments
Description: Australia has implemented a new law requiring organizations with an annual turnover greater than AUS $3 million to report ransomware extortion payments to the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) within 72 hours.
Type: Legislation
Motivation: Improve visibility over ransomware threats
Title: Joint Sanctions Imposed on Bulletproof Hosting Providers Enabling Ransomware Operations
Description: The governments of the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia imposed joint sanctions against individuals and entities (Aleksandr Ermakov, Aleksandr Rakitin, PVServers/DataImpulse, and LumoHost) involved in providing bulletproof hosting (BPH) services. These services were used by ransomware gangs and other threat actors to ignore abuse complaints, law enforcement takedown requests, and legal inquiries, enabling global cybercriminal activity. The sanctions include asset freezes, travel bans, and prohibitions on business transactions with the listed entities, targeting the infrastructure layer of the ransomware economy to disrupt operations before payload delivery.
Type: Sanction
Attack Vector: Bulletproof Hosting (BPH)Malicious Infrastructure Provisioning
Threat Actor: Name: Aleksandr Ermakov, Role: Bulletproof Hosting Provider, Nationality: Russian, Associated Attacks: ['Medibank ransomware attack (Australia)'], Name: Aleksandr Rakitin, Role: Bulletproof Hosting Operator, Nationality: Russian, Name: PVServers (DataImpulse), Role: Hosting Outfit for Threat Actors, Type: Entity, Name: LumoHost, Role: Ransomware Infrastructure Concealment, Type: Entity, Operator: Aleksandr Rakitin.
Motivation: Financial GainFacilitation of CybercrimeInfrastructure-as-a-Service for Ransomware
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Ransomware.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Bulletproof hosting services (PVServers and LumoHost).

Data Compromised: Customer Data

Systems Affected: customer-facing systems
Operational Impact: regrettable disruptions

Data Compromised: Personal data, Health claims data

Data Compromised: Name, Date of birth, Mailing address, Phone number, Email address, Customer ids, Credit card ids

Operational Impact: Disruption of ransomware supply chainIncreased operational costs for cybercriminalsRisk of secondary penalties for entities transacting with sanctioned parties
Brand Reputation Impact: Diplomatic message against cybercrime enablersDeterrence for infrastructure providers
Legal Liabilities: Asset freezesTravel bansProhibitions on business transactionsSecondary penalties for non-compliance
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Customer Data, Personal Data, Health Claims Data, , Name, Date Of Birth, Mailing Address, Phone Number, Email Address, Customer Ids, Credit Card Ids and .

Entity Name: Medibank
Entity Type: Health Insurance Business
Industry: Healthcare
Location: Australia

Entity Name: Medibank Private
Entity Type: Health Insurer
Industry: Healthcare

Entity Name: Medibank
Entity Type: Health Insurance
Industry: Healthcare
Customers Affected: 9700000

Entity Name: Medibank
Entity Type: Health Insurer
Industry: Healthcare
Location: Australia
Customers Affected: 9700000

Entity Name: Australian Organizations
Entity Type: Business
Industry: Various
Location: Australia
Size: Annual turnover greater than AUS $3 million

Entity Name: PVServers (DataImpulse)
Entity Type: Hosting Provider
Industry: Cybercrime Infrastructure
Customers Affected: Ransomware gangs, Phishing operators, Malware C2 server hosts

Entity Name: LumoHost
Entity Type: Hosting Provider
Industry: Cybercrime Infrastructure
Customers Affected: Ransomware groups, Threat actors requiring resilient infrastructure

Entity Name: Aleksandr Ermakov
Entity Type: Individual
Industry: Cybercrime Enablement
Location: Russia

Entity Name: Aleksandr Rakitin
Entity Type: Individual
Industry: Cybercrime Enablement
Location: Russia

Law Enforcement Notified: Yes

Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: U.S. Treasury’S Office Of Foreign Assets Control (Ofac), U.K. Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, Australian Department Of Foreign Affairs.
Containment Measures: Asset freezesTravel bansBusiness transaction prohibitions
Remediation Measures: Disruption of bulletproof hosting infrastructureIncreased operational costs for ransomware actors
Communication Strategy: Public attribution of sanctioned entitiesDiplomatic messaging to encourage global coordination
Enhanced Monitoring: Persistent monitoring of bulletproof hosting providersCollaboration with infrastructure providers and domain registrars
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), U.K. Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, Australian Department of Foreign Affairs, .

Type of Data Compromised: Customer Data

Type of Data Compromised: Personal data, Health claims data
Number of Records Exposed: 9700000
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: namedate of birthaddressphone numberemail address

Type of Data Compromised: Name, Date of birth, Mailing address, Phone number, Email address, Customer ids, Credit card ids
Number of Records Exposed: 9700000
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Disruption of bulletproof hosting infrastructure, Increased operational costs for ransomware actors, .
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by asset freezes, travel bans, business transaction prohibitions and .

Data Exfiltration: True

Ransom Paid: No

Regulatory Notifications: Australian Signals Directorate (ASD)

Regulations Violated: International Sanctions (OFAC, UK FCDO, Australian DFAT),
Legal Actions: Asset freezes, Travel bans, Business prohibitions,
Regulatory Notifications: Public sanction listsSecondary penalty warnings for non-compliant entities
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Asset freezes, Travel bans, Business prohibitions, .

Lessons Learned: Targeting cybercrime infrastructure (e.g., bulletproof hosting) can disrupt ransomware operations at the supply chain level., International collaboration is critical for effective enforcement against globally distributed threat actors., Bulletproof hosting providers frequently rebrand and change jurisdictions to evade scrutiny, requiring persistent monitoring., Sanctions against enablers (not just direct attackers) increase operational risks for cybercriminals and deter infrastructure providers.

Recommendations: Enhance cross-border cooperation to track and disrupt bulletproof hosting providers., Implement stricter due diligence for hosting services to prevent abuse by cybercriminals., Encourage domain registrars and infrastructure providers to proactively monitor and report suspicious activity., Expand sanctions to include other layers of the ransomware economy (e.g., access brokers, cryptocurrency mixers)., Invest in technological solutions to detect and attribute malicious infrastructure reuse.Enhance cross-border cooperation to track and disrupt bulletproof hosting providers., Implement stricter due diligence for hosting services to prevent abuse by cybercriminals., Encourage domain registrars and infrastructure providers to proactively monitor and report suspicious activity., Expand sanctions to include other layers of the ransomware economy (e.g., access brokers, cryptocurrency mixers)., Invest in technological solutions to detect and attribute malicious infrastructure reuse.Enhance cross-border cooperation to track and disrupt bulletproof hosting providers., Implement stricter due diligence for hosting services to prevent abuse by cybercriminals., Encourage domain registrars and infrastructure providers to proactively monitor and report suspicious activity., Expand sanctions to include other layers of the ransomware economy (e.g., access brokers, cryptocurrency mixers)., Invest in technological solutions to detect and attribute malicious infrastructure reuse.Enhance cross-border cooperation to track and disrupt bulletproof hosting providers., Implement stricter due diligence for hosting services to prevent abuse by cybercriminals., Encourage domain registrars and infrastructure providers to proactively monitor and report suspicious activity., Expand sanctions to include other layers of the ransomware economy (e.g., access brokers, cryptocurrency mixers)., Invest in technological solutions to detect and attribute malicious infrastructure reuse.Enhance cross-border cooperation to track and disrupt bulletproof hosting providers., Implement stricter due diligence for hosting services to prevent abuse by cybercriminals., Encourage domain registrars and infrastructure providers to proactively monitor and report suspicious activity., Expand sanctions to include other layers of the ransomware economy (e.g., access brokers, cryptocurrency mixers)., Invest in technological solutions to detect and attribute malicious infrastructure reuse.
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Targeting cybercrime infrastructure (e.g., bulletproof hosting) can disrupt ransomware operations at the supply chain level.,International collaboration is critical for effective enforcement against globally distributed threat actors.,Bulletproof hosting providers frequently rebrand and change jurisdictions to evade scrutiny, requiring persistent monitoring.,Sanctions against enablers (not just direct attackers) increase operational risks for cybercriminals and deter infrastructure providers.

Source: U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

Source: U.K. Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Source: Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade

Source: Statement by Jaishankar Venkatesan, Director of the U.K. Foreign Sanctions Office
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), and Source: U.K. Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, and Source: Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, and Source: Statement by Jaishankar Venkatesan, Director of the U.K. Foreign Sanctions Office.

Investigation Status: Investigated

Investigation Status: Ongoing (sanctions imposed; monitoring for compliance and rebranding attempts)
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public Attribution Of Sanctioned Entities and Diplomatic Messaging To Encourage Global Coordination.

Stakeholder Advisories: Organizations Are Warned Against Transacting With Sanctioned Entities To Avoid Secondary Penalties., Infrastructure Providers (E.G., Hosting Services, Domain Registrars) Are Advised To Enhance Abuse Detection And Reporting Mechanisms., Financial Institutions Are Urged To Monitor Transactions Linked To Bulletproof Hosting Operators..
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Organizations Are Warned Against Transacting With Sanctioned Entities To Avoid Secondary Penalties., Infrastructure Providers (E.G., Hosting Services, Domain Registrars) Are Advised To Enhance Abuse Detection And Reporting Mechanisms. and Financial Institutions Are Urged To Monitor Transactions Linked To Bulletproof Hosting Operators..

Entry Point: Bulletproof Hosting Services (Pvservers, Lumohost),
High Value Targets: Ransomware Groups, Phishing Operators, Malware C2 Servers,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Ransomware Groups, Phishing Operators, Malware C2 Servers,

Root Causes: Lack Of Accountability For Cybercrime-Enabling Infrastructure Providers., Jurisdictional Challenges In Attributing And Sanctioning Threat Actors Operating Across Borders., Rebranding And Operational Flexibility Of Bulletproof Hosting Services To Evade Law Enforcement.,
Corrective Actions: Expand Sanctions To Cover The Full Ransomware Supply Chain (Infrastructure, Access Brokers, Monetization)., Strengthen International Frameworks For Sharing Threat Intelligence And Enforcement Actions., Develop Technological Tools To Track Infrastructure Reuse And Attribute Malicious Activity., Impose Stricter Regulatory Requirements On Hosting Providers To Prevent Abuse.,
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as U.S. Treasury’S Office Of Foreign Assets Control (Ofac), U.K. Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, Australian Department Of Foreign Affairs, , Persistent Monitoring Of Bulletproof Hosting Providers, Collaboration With Infrastructure Providers And Domain Registrars, .
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Expand Sanctions To Cover The Full Ransomware Supply Chain (Infrastructure, Access Brokers, Monetization)., Strengthen International Frameworks For Sharing Threat Intelligence And Enforcement Actions., Develop Technological Tools To Track Infrastructure Reuse And Attribute Malicious Activity., Impose Stricter Regulatory Requirements On Hosting Providers To Prevent Abuse., .
Ransom Payment History: The company has Paid ransoms in the past.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Name: Aleksandr ErmakovRole: Bulletproof Hosting ProviderNationality: RussianAssociated Attacks: Medibank ransomware attack (Australia) and Name: Aleksandr RakitinRole: Bulletproof Hosting OperatorNationality: RussianName: PVServers (DataImpulse)Role: Hosting Outfit for Threat ActorsType: EntityName: LumoHostRole: Ransomware Infrastructure ConcealmentType: EntityOperator: Aleksandr Rakitin.
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on Wednesday.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Customer Data, Personal Data, Health Claims Data, , name, date of birth, mailing address, phone number, email address, customer IDs, credit card IDs and .
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was customer-facing systems.
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was u.s. treasury’s office of foreign assets control (ofac), u.k. foreign, commonwealth & development office, australian department of foreign affairs, .
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Asset freezesTravel bansBusiness transaction prohibitions.
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were date of birth, Health Claims Data, name, mailing address, credit card IDs, Personal Data, Customer Data, customer IDs, email address and phone number.
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 1.9K.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was No.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Asset freezes, Travel bans, Business prohibitions, .
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Sanctions against enablers (not just direct attackers) increase operational risks for cybercriminals and deter infrastructure providers.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Encourage domain registrars and infrastructure providers to proactively monitor and report suspicious activity., Expand sanctions to include other layers of the ransomware economy (e.g., access brokers, cryptocurrency mixers)., Implement stricter due diligence for hosting services to prevent abuse by cybercriminals., Enhance cross-border cooperation to track and disrupt bulletproof hosting providers. and Invest in technological solutions to detect and attribute malicious infrastructure reuse..
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), Statement by Jaishankar Venkatesan, Director of the U.K. Foreign Sanctions Office, U.K. Foreign and Commonwealth & Development Office.
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Investigated.
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Organizations are warned against transacting with sanctioned entities to avoid secondary penalties., Infrastructure providers (e.g., hosting services, domain registrars) are advised to enhance abuse detection and reporting mechanisms., Financial institutions are urged to monitor transactions linked to bulletproof hosting operators., .
.png)
MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.
XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.
An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.
Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.
Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Get company history
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.