Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
MediaFire

MediaFire Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

mediafire.com

MediaFire is a cloud storage service that helps people store, organize, and share data via the Internet. MediaFire offers free and secure cloud storage so users can store and share data with their customers, colleagues, friends, and family. MediaFire’s Professional and Business plans offer users additional functionality, like company branding tools, analytics, and multi-seat employee accounts. MediaFire was founded in August 2006 by a group of website enthusiasts and entrepreneurs from the San Francisco Bay Area who were frustrated by the troublesome process of sharing large files over e-mail and FTP. They created MediaFire to provide the world with the simplest file hosting service for sharing files and images over the internet and


MediaFire A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

MediaFire
Company Information
Website:https://www.mediafire.com
Employees number:60
Number of followers:580
NAICS:5415
Industry Type:IT Services and IT Consulting
Homepage:mediafire.com
MediaFire Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
logo
MediaFireIT Services and IT Consulting
Updated:
03/04/2026
716/1000
Moderate
Ba
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
MediaFire Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
MediaFireIT Services and IT Consulting
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

MediaFire
MediaFireModerate
Current Score
716Ba (MODERATE)
01000
2 incidents
-28 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
718Before Incident
MAY 2026
717Before Incident
APRIL 2026
717Before Incident
MARCH 2026
715Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
741Before Incident
Cyber Attack
02 Feb 2026MediaFire
YouTube, Discord, Google, MediaFire, Telegram, Facebook and TikTok: Arsink RAT Targets Android Devices To Steal Data and Enable Remote Control

Arsink: Android Malware Exploits Cloud Tools for Large-Scale Data Theft

713After Incident
CRITICAL-28
MEDZYPTELMETTIKGOOYOU1770029110
Arsink: Android Malware Exploits Cloud Tools for Large-Scale Data Theft A sophisticated Android remote access trojan (RAT) dubbed Arsink has been uncovered, leveraging free cloud services to steal sensitive data and remotely control infected devices. Security firm Zimperium tracked the malware over several months, identifying 1,216 unique APK files, 317 Firebase command-and-control (C2) servers, and 45,000 victim IP addresses across 143 countries. ### Distribution & Deception Hackers distributed Arsink through Telegram channels, Discord posts, and MediaFire links, disguising it as modified or "pro" versions of popular apps from over 50 brands, including Google, YouTube, WhatsApp, Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook. Once installed, the malware requests excessive permissions, hides its icon, and operates covertly offering no legitimate functionality while harvesting data. ### Four Attack Variants Zimperium identified four primary Arsink variants, each using different cloud-based exfiltration methods: 1. Firebase + Google Apps Script – Small data (e.g., device info) is sent to Firebase Realtime Database, while larger files (photos, audio) are uploaded via Google Apps Script to Google Drive. 2. Telegram Exfiltration – SMS messages, call logs, and device details are transmitted directly to a hacker-controlled Telegram bot. 3. Embedded Dropper – A secondary payload is hidden within the app, extracted and renamed (e.g., Ai_App.zip to App.apk) without requiring internet downloads, evading detection. 4. Hybrid Cloud Abuse – Combines Firebase, Google Drive, and Telegram for data theft and command execution. ### Data Theft & Remote Control Arsink captures a full device snapshot, including: - Device details (model, battery, location, Google account emails) - SMS messages (including one-time passcodes) - Call logs & contacts - Microphone recordings (stored in cloud storage) - Photos & files (listed for potential upload) Attackers can remotely: - Toggle the flashlight, vibrate the phone, or play sounds - Change wallpaper, display messages, or speak text via text-to-speech - Initiate calls, manage files (upload, delete, wipe external storage) - Hide the app icon and maintain persistence via fake foreground notifications ### Global Impact & Victim Distribution The malware has infected users across the Middle East, Asia, Africa, Europe, and the Americas, with the highest concentrations in: - Egypt (13,000 infections) - Indonesia (7,000) - Iraq & Yemen (3,000 each) - Türkiye (2,000) - Pakistan & India (2,500 each) - Bangladesh (1,600) - Algeria & Morocco (1,000 each) India’s high infection rate correlates with frequent Telegram-based APK distribution. ### Mitigation & Response Zimperium collaborated with Google to dismantle malicious Firebase endpoints, Apps Scripts, and accounts. Google Play Protect now blocks known Arsink samples outside the Play Store. However, attackers rapidly adapt, making behavior-based detection critical for enterprises, particularly as the malware targets work-related credentials via SMS interception. Arsink’s use of legitimate cloud services for C2 operations highlights the growing challenge of detecting malware that blends into normal traffic.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Malware (Remote Access Trojan - RAT)
MOTIVATION
Data theftRemote device controlPotential financial gain (e.g., SMS interception for OTPs)
IMPACT
Device detailsSMS messages (including OTPs)Call logsContactsMicrophone recordingsPhotosFilesGoogle account emailsSystems Affected: Android devicesOperational Impact: Remote control of infected devices, potential credential theft, data exfiltrationBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage for brands whose apps were spoofed (e.g., Google, WhatsApp, Instagram)Identity Theft Risk: High (PII and OTP interception)Payment Information Risk: High (SMS-based OTP theft)
DATA BREACH
Device detailsSMS messagesCall logsContactsMicrophone recordingsPhotosFilesGoogle account emailsNumber Of Records Exposed: 45,000+ victim IP addresses (exact records unclear)Sensitivity Of Data: High (PII, OTPs, audio recordings, photos)APKsPhotosAudio recordingsText files
JANUARY 2026
741Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
741Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
741Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
740Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
740Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
739Before Incident
JULY 2025
739Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2024
751Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 Nov 2024MediaFire
Facebook, Dropbox and MediaFire: Threat Actors Exploit Copyright Takedowns to Deliver Malware

Lone None Threat Group Deploys New Stealers via Fake Copyright Takedown Notices

734After Incident
CRITICAL-17
FACDROMED1768636787
Lone None Threat Group Deploys New Stealers via Fake Copyright Takedown Notices Since November 2024, the Lone None threat actor group has been orchestrating a sophisticated email campaign distributing two information stealers: Pure Logs Stealer and the newly identified Lone None Stealer (PXA Stealer). The campaign spoofs legal firms worldwide, using copyright infringement takedown notices as lures to trick recipients into executing malicious payloads. The emails, written in at least ten languages likely via machine translation or AI reference authentic Facebook accounts of victims to enhance credibility. Embedded links, often shortened via t[.]ee or g[.]su, redirect to free file-hosting services like Dropbox and MediaFire, where victims download an archive disguised as a PDF reader installer. In reality, the archive contains a repurposed Haihaisoft PDF Reader executable, a malicious DLL acting as a Python installer, legitimate documents, and files with mismatched extensions. Upon execution, the loader uses Windows certutil.exe to decode a disguised PDF archive, saving it under a different extension. A bundled WinRAR executable (renamed "images.png") extracts the decoded files into C:\Users\Public. The malicious DLL then launches a staged Python interpreter (svchost.exe), installing Python in the same directory and executing an obfuscated script. The script communicates with a Telegram bot C2 channel, where part of a paste[.]rs URL is stored in the bot’s bio. The script reconstructs the URL to fetch a secondary payload from 0x0[.]st, delivering either Pure Logs Stealer or Lone None Stealer. Both stealers employ Base64/Base85 encoding and AES encryption to evade detection. Lone None Stealer specifically targets cryptocurrency by monitoring the Windows clipboard for wallet addresses, replacing them with actor-controlled wallets for Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana. Observed wallet addresses include: - Bitcoin: `1DPguuHEophw6rvPZZkjBA3d8Z9ntCqm1L` - Ethereum: `0xd38c3fc36ee1d0f4c4ddaeebb72e5ce2d5e7646c` - Solana: `GQwKEEi49iKywE8ycnFsxRhxJTVf6YsoJb2vAFigc8` Earlier variants delivered XWorm and DuckTail, but recent attacks have streamlined to focus on Pure Logs Stealer’s RAT capabilities and Lone None Stealer’s cryptocurrency theft. Persistence is maintained via a registry Run key pointing to the staged Python interpreter. Defenders are advised to monitor for clandestine Python installations in C:\Users\Public\Windows, suspicious Run key entries, and anomalous executions of certutil.exe and WinRAR with renamed files. The campaign underscores the evolving tactics of threat actors in leveraging social engineering and unconventional C2 channels to distribute malware.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Malware Campaign
MOTIVATION
Financial Gain (Cryptocurrency Theft)
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Personally Identifiable Information, Cryptocurrency Wallet Addresses, Sensitive DocumentsSystems Affected: Windows SystemsIdentity Theft Risk: HighPayment Information Risk: High (Cryptocurrency)
DATA BREACH
Personally Identifiable InformationCryptocurrency Wallet AddressesSensitive DocumentsSensitivity Of Data: HighData Exfiltration: Yes (via Telegram bot C2 channel)Data Encryption: AES Encryption (for payload delivery)PDFDLLPython ScriptsPersonally Identifiable Information: Yes

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for MediaFire ?
?
What was MediaFire's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was MediaFire's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was MediaFire's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was MediaFire's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was MediaFire's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was MediaFire's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was MediaFire's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was MediaFire's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was MediaFire's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was MediaFire's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was MediaFire's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on MediaFire's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with MediaFire ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view MediaFire's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?