Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MedAssist, a Firstsource companyMedAssist, a Firstsource company
VS
Prisma HealthPrisma Health
MedAssist, a Firstsource company

MedAssist, a Firstsource company

Mumbai, IN

Last Update: 15/07/2026

View Profile

Offering full-service, end-to-end revenue cycle solutions, Firstsource combines technology with deep domain and industry expertise to help organizations realize high levels of patient satisfaction and improved financial performance. Through listening and partnering, we ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:406
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Prisma Health

Prisma Health

300 E McBee Ave, Greenville, 29601, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
770/1000Fair

Prisma Health is the largest not-for-profit health organization in South Carolina, serving more than 1.2 million patients annually. Our facilities in the Greenville and Columbia surrounding markets are dedicated to improving the health of all South Carolinians through i...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:14,723
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MedAssist, a Firstsource company

MedAssist, a Firstsource company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Prisma Health

Prisma Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

MedAssist, a Firstsource company has 27.54% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prisma Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MedAssist, a Firstsource company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MedAssist, a Firstsource company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Prisma Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prisma Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MedAssist, a Firstsource company

MedAssist, a Firstsource company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MED1784132982
Prisma Health

Prisma Health

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
PRI33923423

FAQ

Between MedAssist, a Firstsource company company and Prisma Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MedAssist, a Firstsource company company and Prisma Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MedAssist, a Firstsource company company and Prisma Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MedAssist, a Firstsource company company and Prisma Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MedAssist, a Firstsource company company and Prisma Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MedAssist, a Firstsource company company and Prisma Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MedAssist, a Firstsource company company and Prisma Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MedAssist, a Firstsource company company and Prisma Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MedAssist, a Firstsource company company and Prisma Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MedAssist, a Firstsource company company and Prisma Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MedAssist, a Firstsource company company and Prisma Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MedAssist, a Firstsource company and Prisma Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MedAssist, a Firstsource company and Prisma Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MedAssist, a Firstsource company or Prisma Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MedAssist, a Firstsource company or Prisma Health ?
Between MedAssist, a Firstsource company and Prisma Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MedAssist, a Firstsource company and Prisma Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67595
SUMMARY

VaahCMS versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 contain a malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload embedded in the Blade template responsible for rendering security OTP emails, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code in any browser that renders the affected email template with JavaScript enabled. The payload establishes a WebSocket connection to a hardcoded command-and-control endpoint, installs a password-field keylogger using MutationObserver to capture dynamically added inputs, scrapes WhatsApp Web DOM content, and accepts remote commands to redirect or overwrite the rendered page.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-15157
SUMMARY

undici does not validate the type property of a duck-typed blob-like request body before using it as the Content-Type header on the HTTP/1.1 dispatcher. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, an application that passes a hand-rolled blob-like body (via request, stream, pipeline, or dispatch) whose type is derived from untrusted input allows an attacker to inject CRLF sequences and append arbitrary HTTP headers, potentially smuggling a second request past the upstream. Native Blob objects are safe because their constructor strips CRLF from the type, and fetch is unaffected because it validates headers, but ecosystem libraries that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input can reach the vulnerable path. This is the same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 and CVE-2026-1527, on a header sink that the earlier fixes did not cover. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-14643
SUMMARY

undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-69945
SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /doctor/edit-patient.php?editid=1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA