Comparison Overview
MED-EL

MED-EL
Fürstenweg 77a, Innsbruck, Tyrol, 6020, AT
Last Update: 19/03/2026
MED-EL GmbH develops and manufactures cutting-edge hearing implant solutions and other medical devices. Since its founding more than 20 years ago, the company has continually expanded and now sells its products in over 140 countries with more than 30 offices worldwide. ...

Edwards Lifesciences
One Edwards Way, Irvine, 92614, US
Last Update: 11/09/2026
Edwards Lifesciences (NYSE: EW), is the leading global structural heart innovation company, driven by a passion to improve patient lives. Through breakthrough technologies, world-class evidence and partnerships with clinicians and healthcare stakeholders, our employees ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

MED-EL







Edwards Lifesciences






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for MED-EL in 2026.
Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Edwards Lifesciences in 2026.
Incident History - MED-EL (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MED-EL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Edwards Lifesciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Edwards Lifesciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

MED-EL

Edwards Lifesciences
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.