Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Mechanical Specialties Contractors, IncMechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc
VS
COLASCOLAS
Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc

Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc

4412 Tryon Rd, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27606, US

Last Update: 16/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://mscpiping.com
752/1000Fair

Mechanical Specialties Contractors (MSC) is a leader in the fabrication and installation of high-purity and process piping systems. Backed by a knowledgeable professional staff, quality workmanship, and a safe working environment, we provide high-performance solutions ...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:23
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
COLAS

COLAS

1, Rue du Colonel Pierre Avia, Paris, 75015, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://allinks.click/colas
841/1000Good

Colas, a subsidiary of the Bouygues Group, is a major player in the construction and maintenance of transportation infrastructure and urban development. Colas covers the entire value chain: from industrial production to service offerings, including construction work. ...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:16,508
Subsidiaries:119
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc

Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
COLAS

COLAS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for COLAS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - COLAS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

COLAS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc

Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
COLAS

COLAS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc company and COLAS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc company and COLAS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc company and COLAS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc company and COLAS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc company and COLAS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc company and COLAS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc company and COLAS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc company and COLAS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc company and COLAS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc company and COLAS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc company and COLAS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc and COLAS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc and COLAS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc or COLAS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc or COLAS ?
Between Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc and COLAS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Mechanical Specialties Contractors, Inc and COLAS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA