Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China
VS
EssityEssity
美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China

美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China

N/A

Last Update: 17/03/2026

View Profile
762/1000Fair

美赞臣营养品公司于1905年在美国创立。自创立之日起,美赞臣秉承“给宝宝一生最好的开始”这一企业使命,坚持以科学为本进行产品研发和创新,为全球婴幼儿提供科学营养。美赞臣所生产的70多种营养产品,包括20多种针对特殊营养需求和代谢问题的特殊配方产品,行销50多个国家和地区,深受全球家庭、营养专家和医务工作者的广泛信赖。 1993年,作为改革开放初期最早来到中国的外资企业之一,美赞臣正式进入中国,全面服务中国市场。同年,美赞臣在广州经济技术开发区设立生产基地。该基地于1995年投产,秉承美赞臣“全球一致”的质量标准,通过全...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:325
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Essity

Essity

Klarabergsviadukten 63, Stockholm, SE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
795/1000Fair

Essity - a globally leading hygiene and health company. Our expertise in hygiene and health began with the acquisition of the Swedish company Mölnlycke in 1975, through which our roots stretch back to 1849. Today, our sustainable innovations from globally trusted brands...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:19,495
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China

美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Essity

Essity

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Essity in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China (X = Date, Y = Severity)

美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Essity (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Essity cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China

美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Essity

Essity

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between 美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China company and Essity company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China company and Essity company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China company and Essity company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China company and Essity company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China company and Essity company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China company and Essity company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China company and Essity company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China company and Essity company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China company and Essity company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China company and Essity company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China company and Essity company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China and Essity, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China and Essity, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China or Essity ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China or Essity ?
Between 美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China and Essity, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 美赞臣中国 Mead Johnson Nutrition China and Essity, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59705
SUMMARY

mem0's openmemory/api component contains an unauthenticated access vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to read, write, and delete arbitrary user memories by accessing API routers registered without authentication middleware. Attackers can supply arbitrary user_id parameters or directly access memory retrieval endpoints to expose private memory content, or invoke pause endpoints with global_pause=true to cause denial-of-service across all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59704
SUMMARY

Cap's GET /api/video/ai endpoint fails to validate user ownership or membership before returning private video AI metadata including titles, summaries, and chapters. Authenticated attackers can supply arbitrary video IDs to read sensitive AI-generated content and trigger unauthorized AI generation that consumes the video owner's credits without consent.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-55078
SUMMARY

Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Starting in version 2.17.0 and prior to versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, `POST /api/v2/files` converts zip uploads to tar in memory via `CreateTarFromZip`, which enforced a per-entry size limit but no aggregate limit on total decompressed output, writing to an unbounded in-memory buffer. Exploitation requires authenticated file-upload access and the impact is limited to availability (denial of service). The fix in versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2 adds a metadata preflight check that sums projected entry sizes and a streaming writer that enforces the aggregate limit during decompression. As a workaround, restrict file-upload permissions to trusted users or place a reverse proxy with request-body size limits in front of `coderd`.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-55077
SUMMARY

Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Prior to versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, the `PUT /api/v2/users/{user}/password` endpoint authorized only `ActionUpdatePersonal` and did not prevent a `user-admin` from resetting an `owner` account's password. It also did not require the current password when an admin reset another user's password. Exploitation requires the privileged `user-admin` role so practical risk is limited to deployments that grant `user-admin` to less trusted operators. The fix in versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2 prevents non-owner users from resetting the password of an account that holds the `owner` role. As a workaround, restrict the `user-admin` role to trusted administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-55076
SUMMARY

Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Prior to versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, Coder's OIDC callback checked `email_verified` with a direct Go `bool` type assertion. When an IdP returned the claim as a non-boolean (for example the string `"false"`) or omitted it, the assertion failed open and the email was treated as verified. Combined with an unconditional email-based account fallback, this enabled account takeover. The fix in versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2 coerces `email_verified` across bool, string and numeric types (fail-closed) and blocks the email fallback when the matched user already has a different linked IdP subject. As a workaround, ensure the IdP returns `email_verified` as a native JSON boolean. The email-fallback linking issue has no configuration workaround; upgrading is required.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2