Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

McPhail Sanchez, LLCMcPhail Sanchez, LLC
VS
AGT AbogadosAGT Abogados
McPhail Sanchez, LLC

McPhail Sanchez, LLC

126 Government St, Mobile, 36602, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://mslawyers.law
751/1000Fair

In 1994, two attorneys came together with an idea: a default servicing law firm with a new approach. They believed that high-quality, professional representation of creditors could be achieved without compromising either the client’s rights or a litigant’s dignity. This...

NAICS:5411
NAICS Definition:Legal Services
Employees:27
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AGT Abogados

AGT Abogados

Bogotá, 110911, CO

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.agtabogados.com/
748/1000Moderate

AGT Abogados, nace con el fin de proveer soluciones y prevenciones eficaces en asuntos jurídicos a nuestros clientes, con los cuales trabajamos en estrecha relación, buscando alcanzar el éxito de las labores encomendadas. Nuestra firma está conformada por abogados con e...

NAICS:5411
NAICS Definition:Legal Services
Employees:6
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
McPhail Sanchez, LLC

McPhail Sanchez, LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AGT Abogados

AGT Abogados

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McPhail Sanchez, LLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AGT Abogados in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - McPhail Sanchez, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McPhail Sanchez, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AGT Abogados (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AGT Abogados cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
McPhail Sanchez, LLC

McPhail Sanchez, LLC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AGT Abogados

AGT Abogados

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between McPhail Sanchez, LLC company and AGT Abogados company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between McPhail Sanchez, LLC company and AGT Abogados company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between McPhail Sanchez, LLC company and AGT Abogados company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between McPhail Sanchez, LLC company and AGT Abogados company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between McPhail Sanchez, LLC company and AGT Abogados company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between McPhail Sanchez, LLC company and AGT Abogados company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between McPhail Sanchez, LLC company and AGT Abogados company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between McPhail Sanchez, LLC company and AGT Abogados company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between McPhail Sanchez, LLC company and AGT Abogados company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between McPhail Sanchez, LLC company and AGT Abogados company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between McPhail Sanchez, LLC company and AGT Abogados company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between McPhail Sanchez, LLC and AGT Abogados, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between McPhail Sanchez, LLC and AGT Abogados, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - McPhail Sanchez, LLC or AGT Abogados ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - McPhail Sanchez, LLC or AGT Abogados ?
Between McPhail Sanchez, LLC and AGT Abogados, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between McPhail Sanchez, LLC and AGT Abogados, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-12814
SUMMARY

A flaw has been found in Comfast CF-WR631AX V3 up to 2.7.0.8. This issue affects the function system of the file /cgi-bin/mbox-config?section=ping_config of the component API Endpoint. This manipulation of the argument destination causes os command injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-21
UPDATED
Date2026-06-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-12813
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in activepieces up to 0.83.0. This vulnerability affects the function handleUrlFile in the library packages/server/engine/src/lib/variables/processors/file.ts of the component File URL Handler. The manipulation results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-21
UPDATED
Date2026-06-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-12812
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in Radware Cyber Controller up to 10.11.0. This affects an unknown part of the component HTML Report Generation. The manipulation leads to HTML injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-21
UPDATED
Date2026-06-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-12811
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in kortix-ai suna up to 0.8.38. Affected by this issue is the function router.replace/router.push of the file apps/frontend/src/app/auth/page.tsx of the component Auth Endpoint. Executing a manipulation of the argument returnURL can lead to cross site scripting. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Upgrading to version 0.8.39 can resolve this issue. This patch is called f5dec7aa0c1b8fa0125938f292c0f2430ca75f6c. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The researcher explains: "The issue was fixed in v0.8.39 without notifying the wider user base via a security disclosure."

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-21
UPDATED
Date2026-06-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-12810
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in Edimax BR-6478AC V2 1.23. Affected by this vulnerability is the function mp of the file /goform/mp of the component POST Request Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument command results in command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-21
UPDATED
Date2026-06-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8