Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Marquette County Medical Care FacilityMarquette County Medical Care Facility
VS
Sharp HealthCareSharp HealthCare
Marquette County Medical Care Facility

Marquette County Medical Care Facility

200 Saginaw St, Ishpeming, 49849, US

Last Update: 27/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.mqtcmcf.org
712/1000Moderate

The Marquette County Medical Care Facility provides a family oriented environment, where people both young and old can share their lives together. Whether you or your family member are in need of long-term care, or short-term recovery care, Marquette County Medical Car...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:45
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Sharp HealthCare

Sharp HealthCare

8695 Spectrum Center Blvd., San Diego, 92123, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
742/1000Moderate

Sharp HealthCare is a not-for-profit health care system based in San Diego, California, with four acute care hospitals, three specialty hospitals, three medical groups and a health plan. We provide medical services in virtually all fields of medicine, including primary ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:11,373
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Marquette County Medical Care Facility

Marquette County Medical Care Facility

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sharp HealthCare

Sharp HealthCare

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marquette County Medical Care Facility in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sharp HealthCare in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Marquette County Medical Care Facility (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marquette County Medical Care Facility cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sharp HealthCare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sharp HealthCare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Marquette County Medical Care Facility

Marquette County Medical Care Facility

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MCM1767852088
Sharp HealthCare

Sharp HealthCare

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SHA557072825
🔒 Incident : Breach
SHA1038072825

FAQ

Between Marquette County Medical Care Facility company and Sharp HealthCare company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Marquette County Medical Care Facility company and Sharp HealthCare company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Marquette County Medical Care Facility company and Sharp HealthCare company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Marquette County Medical Care Facility company and Sharp HealthCare company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Marquette County Medical Care Facility company and Sharp HealthCare company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Marquette County Medical Care Facility company and Sharp HealthCare company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Marquette County Medical Care Facility company and Sharp HealthCare company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Marquette County Medical Care Facility company and Sharp HealthCare company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Marquette County Medical Care Facility company and Sharp HealthCare company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Marquette County Medical Care Facility company and Sharp HealthCare company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Marquette County Medical Care Facility company and Sharp HealthCare company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Marquette County Medical Care Facility and Sharp HealthCare, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Marquette County Medical Care Facility and Sharp HealthCare, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Marquette County Medical Care Facility or Sharp HealthCare ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Marquette County Medical Care Facility or Sharp HealthCare ?
Between Marquette County Medical Care Facility and Sharp HealthCare, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Marquette County Medical Care Facility and Sharp HealthCare, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8