Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea)맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea)
VS
WSPWSP
맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea)

맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea)

54F Three IFC, 10 Gukjegeumyung-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Seoul, 07326, KR

Last Update: 31/01/2026

View Profile
755/1000Fair

맥킨지앤드컴퍼니(McKinsey & Company)는 세계 유수의 기업, 정부, 공공기관의 신뢰받는 자문 파트너로 활동하는 글로벌 경영 컨설팅 기업입니다. 민간, 공공, 사회 전반에 걸친 다양한 조직들과 협업하며, 깊이 있는 전문성과 폭넓은 글로벌 네트워크를 바탕으로 복잡하고 중요한 과제를 해결합니다. 우리는 고객과 함께 역량과 리더십을 강화하며, 실질적인 해법 도출과 지속 가능한 변화에 기여하는 것을 목표로 합니다. 해당 페이지에서는 맥킨지 한국 오피스의 미디어 활동,...

NAICS:54
NAICS Definition:Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:45
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
WSP

WSP

1600, boul. René-Lévesque ouest, 11e étage, Montreal, Quebec, CA, H3H 1P9

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://wsp.com
811/1000Good

We are one of the world’s leading professional services firms, uniting our engineering, advisory and science-based expertise to shape communities to advance humanity. ​ ​From local beginnings to a globe-spanning presence today, we operate in over 50 countries and emplo...

NAICS:54
NAICS Definition:Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Employees:69,374
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea)

맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
WSP

WSP

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WSP in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - WSP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WSP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea)

맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
WSP

WSP

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) company and WSP company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) company and WSP company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) company and WSP company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) company and WSP company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) company and WSP company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) company and WSP company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) company and WSP company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) company and WSP company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) company and WSP company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) company and WSP company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) company and WSP company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) and WSP, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) and WSP, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) or WSP ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) or WSP ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) and WSP, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) and WSP, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-48777
SUMMARY

FileBrowser Quantum is a free, self-hosted, web-based file manager. Versions prior to 1.3.2-stable, 1.4.0-beta and 1.4.1-beta are vulnerable to Path Traversal through the publicPatchHandler in backend/http/public.go which joins user-controlled fromPath and toPath body fields with the trusted d.share.Path BEFORE the downstream sanitizer runs. Because filepath.Join collapses .. segments during the join, the sanitizer in resourcePatchHandler never sees the traversal and the move/copy/rename operates on a path outside the shared directory. The same root-cause pattern was patched for the bulk DELETE endpoint as CVE-2026-44542 (GHSA-fwj3-42wh-8673), but the PATCH handler with the identical pattern was not updated. A public share link with AllowModify=true is sufficient to exploit this. Anyone holding such a link can move, copy, or rename arbitrary files within the share owner's source root. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.3.3-stable and 1.4.2-beta.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47750
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the GLOBAL opcode handler. The issue was caused by missing validation when searching for newline-delimited fields. A crafted .ckpt file without the expected newline could cause the parser to use -1 as a copy length, resulting in immediate heap corruption. The attack requires the victim or application to load a .ckpt file from an untrusted source, such as a downloaded model from a model sharing site. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by following these instructions: do not load .ckpt checkpoint files from untrusted sources, and prefer trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-47747
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the BINUNICODE opcode handler. The issue was caused by sign confusion on the opcode length field. A crafted .ckpt file could trigger memcpy with a very large length derived from a negative signed value, causing immediate heap corruption. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by only loading .ckpt checkpoint files from trusted sources and preferring trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-46448
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Nova before 33.0.2, the server create API does not strip certain hint data. The resulting instance has no Placement allocation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-22313
SUMMARY

The device has a webserver that exposes a REST API authenticated with a token on the management network. By exploiting an OS command injection vulnerability an authenticated attacker can send arbitrary commands to the device that are executed with administrative permissions by the underlying operating system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3