Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea)맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea)
VS
PwCPwC
맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea)

맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea)

54F Three IFC, 10 Gukjegeumyung-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Seoul, 07326, KR

Last Update: 31/01/2026

View Profile
755/1000Fair

맥킨지앤드컴퍼니(McKinsey & Company)는 세계 유수의 기업, 정부, 공공기관의 신뢰받는 자문 파트너로 활동하는 글로벌 경영 컨설팅 기업입니다. 민간, 공공, 사회 전반에 걸친 다양한 조직들과 협업하며, 깊이 있는 전문성과 폭넓은 글로벌 네트워크를 바탕으로 복잡하고 중요한 과제를 해결합니다. 우리는 고객과 함께 역량과 리더십을 강화하며, 실질적인 해법 도출과 지속 가능한 변화에 기여하는 것을 목표로 합니다. 해당 페이지에서는 맥킨지 한국 오피스의 미디어 활동,...

NAICS:54
NAICS Definition:Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:45
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
PwC

PwC

1 Embankment Place, GB

Last Update: 19/06/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.pwc.com/gx/en
821/1000Good

At PwC, we help clients drive their companies to the leading edge. We’re a tech-forward, people-empowered network with more than 370,000 people in 149 countries. Across audit and assurance, tax and legal, deals and consulting we help build, accelerate and sustain moment...

NAICS:54
NAICS Definition:Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Employees:294,614
Subsidiaries:55
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea)

맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PwC

PwC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PwC in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PwC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PwC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea)

맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
PwC

PwC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
OFCK&LAONPROKIRSHEPWCMOV1781843490

FAQ

Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) company and PwC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) company and PwC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) company and PwC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) company and PwC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) company and PwC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) company and PwC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) company and PwC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) company and PwC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) company and PwC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) company and PwC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) company and PwC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) and PwC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) and PwC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) or PwC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) or PwC ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) and PwC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 맥킨지앤드컴퍼니 (McKinsey Korea) and PwC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56082
SUMMARY

Capgo (Cap-go/capgo) before 12.128.2 contains an improper access control vulnerability in the SECURITY DEFINER PostgREST RPC function public.record_build_time, which is granted to the anon role and callable with only the public Supabase publishable (sb_publishable_*) anon key. An unauthenticated attacker can insert rows into public.build_logs for arbitrary organizations and, because the function uses ON CONFLICT (build_id, org_id) DO UPDATE, can overwrite existing usage/billing records by reusing the same build_id for a target org. This enables cross-tenant tampering of billing build logs and financial-impact denial of service by inflating billable build time.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-19
UPDATED
Date2026-06-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56081
SUMMARY

Cap-go before 12.128.2 contains an authentication logic flaw that lets an attacker register and control an account bound to a victim's email address before that email is verified. By enabling two-factor authentication on the pre-registered account, the attacker gains control over the account claimed under the victim's identity, allowing them to read and modify its state and enforce organization-level policies, while the legitimate user is denied access to the account tied to their own email.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-19
UPDATED
Date2026-06-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56080
SUMMARY

Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a flaw in the Enforce Password Policy feature: after a Super Admin enables the policy and successfully changes their password to a compliant one, the backend does not update the password-compliance state. As a result, the backend continues to treat the account as non-compliant and repeatedly forces password-reset prompts, permanently locking the Super Admin out of organization access (organization lockout / denial of service) despite valid authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-19
UPDATED
Date2026-06-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-56079
SUMMARY

Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a cross-tenant authorization bypass vulnerability in PostgREST endpoints that allows org-scoped read API keys to access other tenants' webhook secrets and delivery logs. Attackers can query the webhooks and webhook_deliveries endpoints to exfiltrate HMAC signing secrets and delivery payloads, enabling forged webhook events against victim organizations.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-19
UPDATED
Date2026-06-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56073
SUMMARY

Cap-go before 12.128.2 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in OTP verification that allows attackers to bypass email verification by modifying server responses. Attackers can intercept OTP verification requests and manipulate HTTP responses to falsely mark verification successful, enabling unauthorized 2FA enablement and account takeover.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-19
UPDATED
Date2026-06-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9