Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

McKinsey & Company JapanMcKinsey & Company Japan
VS
StantecStantec
McKinsey & Company Japan

McKinsey & Company Japan

六本木1-9-10 アークヒルズ仙石山森タワー, 港区, 106-0032, JP

Last Update: 28/12/2025

View Profile
755/1000Fair

マッキンゼー・アンド・カンパニージャパンは1971年の設立以来、日本企業の成長に貢献してまいりました。2018年には関西オフィスを開設し、西日本においても企業の持続的な発展を目指して活動しております。 戦略再構築・事業収益変革・組織人材変革・デジタル化・グローバル化・ESG等の喫緊の経営課題解決をトップマネジメントと協業。企業・組織の飛躍的変革と持続的発展に尽力いたします。

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Stantec

Stantec

10160-112 Street, Edmonton, T5K 2L6, CA

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.stantec.com
779/1000Fair

Stantec empowers clients, people, and communities to rise to the world’s greatest challenges at a time when the world faces more unprecedented concerns than ever before. We are a global leader in sustainable engineering, architecture, and environmental consulting. Ou...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:31,451
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
McKinsey & Company Japan

McKinsey & Company Japan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Stantec

Stantec

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McKinsey & Company Japan in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stantec in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - McKinsey & Company Japan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McKinsey & Company Japan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Stantec (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stantec cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
McKinsey & Company Japan

McKinsey & Company Japan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Stantec

Stantec

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between McKinsey & Company Japan company and Stantec company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between McKinsey & Company Japan company and Stantec company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between McKinsey & Company Japan company and Stantec company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between McKinsey & Company Japan company and Stantec company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between McKinsey & Company Japan company and Stantec company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between McKinsey & Company Japan company and Stantec company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between McKinsey & Company Japan company and Stantec company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between McKinsey & Company Japan company and Stantec company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between McKinsey & Company Japan company and Stantec company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between McKinsey & Company Japan company and Stantec company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between McKinsey & Company Japan company and Stantec company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between McKinsey & Company Japan and Stantec, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between McKinsey & Company Japan and Stantec, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - McKinsey & Company Japan or Stantec ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - McKinsey & Company Japan or Stantec ?
Between McKinsey & Company Japan and Stantec, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between McKinsey & Company Japan and Stantec, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9