Comparison Overview
MCI- Midis Group

MCI- Midis Group
2 rue du Kefir, Orly Cedex, Ile de france, 94537, FR
Last Update: 29/03/2026
En charge des opérations d'Apple (vente, marketing, service) sur le Maghreb, l'Afrique de l'Ouest, l'Afrique de l'Est et les départements et territoires d'outre mer français

Tietoevry
Helsinki, FI-02101, FI
Last Update: 01/04/2026
In a rapidly changing world, technology is everything. It's in the fabric of society. In every part of every business. At the very heart of human evolution. It’s a great power that comes with great responsibility. At Tietoevry, we believe it’s time to shift perspective...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

MCI- Midis Group







Tietoevry






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for MCI- Midis Group in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tietoevry in 2026.
Incident History - MCI- Midis Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MCI- Midis Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Tietoevry (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tietoevry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

MCI- Midis Group

Tietoevry
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.