Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MCI - Craft Brewing MaltsMCI - Craft Brewing Malts
VS
GreggsGreggs
MCI - Craft Brewing Malts

MCI - Craft Brewing Malts

undefined, Cork, undefined, undefined, IE

Last Update: 24/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.maltingcompany.ie
763/1000Fair

MCI now offers a range of quality, Irish whole & crushed base malts, in 25kg bags, ideal for craft brewers & distillers. You can order directly on-line, 24/7, for deliveries to Ireland and the UK.

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Greggs

Greggs

GB

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.greggs.co.uk
770/1000Fair

Greggs is a leading food-on-the-go retailer with over 2,400 shops nationwide and serving over six million customers a week. We stand for great tasting, freshly prepared food that our customers can trust, at affordable prices and aim to become the customers’ favourite ...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:12,822
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MCI - Craft Brewing Malts

MCI - Craft Brewing Malts

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Greggs

Greggs

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MCI - Craft Brewing Malts in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Greggs in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MCI - Craft Brewing Malts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MCI - Craft Brewing Malts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Greggs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greggs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MCI - Craft Brewing Malts

MCI - Craft Brewing Malts

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Greggs

Greggs

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between MCI - Craft Brewing Malts company and Greggs company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MCI - Craft Brewing Malts company and Greggs company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MCI - Craft Brewing Malts company and Greggs company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MCI - Craft Brewing Malts company and Greggs company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MCI - Craft Brewing Malts company and Greggs company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MCI - Craft Brewing Malts company and Greggs company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MCI - Craft Brewing Malts company and Greggs company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MCI - Craft Brewing Malts company and Greggs company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MCI - Craft Brewing Malts company and Greggs company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MCI - Craft Brewing Malts company and Greggs company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MCI - Craft Brewing Malts company and Greggs company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MCI - Craft Brewing Malts and Greggs, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MCI - Craft Brewing Malts and Greggs, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MCI - Craft Brewing Malts or Greggs ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MCI - Craft Brewing Malts or Greggs ?
Between MCI - Craft Brewing Malts and Greggs, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MCI - Craft Brewing Malts and Greggs, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2