Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

McGraw Hill Higher EducationMcGraw Hill Higher Education
VS
Apollo Education GroupApollo Education Group
McGraw Hill Higher Education

McGraw Hill Higher Education

N/A

Last Update: 13/04/2026

View Profile
766/1000Fair

Learn about McGraw Hill's digital solutions, textbooks, and services for students and instructors in higher education.

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:1
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Apollo Education Group

Apollo Education Group

4025 S. Riverpoint Pkwy, Phoenix, 85040, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.apollo.edu
665/1000Weak

Apollo Education Group, Inc. was founded in 1973 in response to a gradual shift in higher education demographics from a student population dominated by youth to one in which approximately half the students are adults and over 80 percent of whom work full-time. Apollo's ...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:10,192
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
McGraw Hill Higher Education

McGraw Hill Higher Education

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Apollo Education Group

Apollo Education Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McGraw Hill Higher Education in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Apollo Education Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - McGraw Hill Higher Education (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McGraw Hill Higher Education cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Apollo Education Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Apollo Education Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
McGraw Hill Higher Education

McGraw Hill Higher Education

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Apollo Education Group

Apollo Education Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
APO1764801272
🔒 Incident : Breach
APO1764771057

FAQ

Between McGraw Hill Higher Education company and Apollo Education Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between McGraw Hill Higher Education company and Apollo Education Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between McGraw Hill Higher Education company and Apollo Education Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between McGraw Hill Higher Education company and Apollo Education Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between McGraw Hill Higher Education company and Apollo Education Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between McGraw Hill Higher Education company and Apollo Education Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between McGraw Hill Higher Education company and Apollo Education Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between McGraw Hill Higher Education company and Apollo Education Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between McGraw Hill Higher Education company and Apollo Education Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between McGraw Hill Higher Education company and Apollo Education Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between McGraw Hill Higher Education company and Apollo Education Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between McGraw Hill Higher Education and Apollo Education Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between McGraw Hill Higher Education and Apollo Education Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - McGraw Hill Higher Education or Apollo Education Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - McGraw Hill Higher Education or Apollo Education Group ?
Between McGraw Hill Higher Education and Apollo Education Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between McGraw Hill Higher Education and Apollo Education Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-71194
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.2, the mDNS handler performs pool-blind lookups when resolving record queries and NOTIFY requests. When two zones with the same name exist across different pools, the lookup fails with a deterministic error, causing the handler to return REFUSED for all DNS queries through that path. The _handle_notify path is exploitable via a single unauthenticated UDP packet. This is independently reachable through the cross-tenant zone overlap described in a different recent CVE, and also affects legitimate same-tenant cross-pool configurations. BIND9 views do not mitigate this issue as mDNS is a shared service upstream of any view configuration.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-71193
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.1, zone creation checks (_is_subzone, _is_superzone, and the duplicate-zone DB constraint) are scoped to the target pool only. An authenticated user can bypass these checks by scheduling a zone to a different pool via the AttributeFilter scheduler, creating an overlapping zone that conflicts with another tenant's zone. This enables cross-tenant DNS hijack (redirecting traffic to attacker-controlled IPs) and DNS denial of service (NODATA responses). Exploitation requires a multi-pool deployment with AttributeFilter enabled in scheduler_filters, which is a non-default but documented and supported configuration for self-service tiering.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-49481
SUMMARY

UpSnap is a wake on lan web app. Versions prior to 5.4.0 have an OS command injection vulnerability in the UpSnap’s device management functionality due to the presence of unsafe shell command template interpolation using the ip and the mac fields. User-controlled values can be inserted into the wake_cmd and shutdown_cmd templates and executed via /bin/sh -c (Linux) or cmd /C (Windows) without sanitization, resulting in an authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE). A low-privileged user with permission to create or edit devices can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the UpSnap hosted server. Version 5.4.0 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-47718
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. When `secureEnabled=true`, FUXA `1.3.0-2773` still allows guest and invalid-token requests to read project, alarms, and scheduler APIs. Version 1.3.1 fixes this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47717
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. In fuxa-server version 1.3.0, the GET /api/project endpoint exposes sensitive project configuration data to guest-context requests even when secureEnabled is enabled. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9