Comparison Overview
McGraw Hill

McGraw Hill
1325 Avenue of the Americas, New York, 10019, US
Last Update: 27/07/2026
We are a leading global education company that partners with millions of educators, learners and professionals around the world. At McGraw Hill, we believe that your diverse experiences enrich the way you learn, teach and grow. Every educator teaches differently. Every ...

TAFE NSW
Cnr Harris St & Mary Ann St, Ultimo, New South Wales, AU, 2007
Last Update: 11/09/2026
TAFE NSW is one of Australia's leading vocational education and training provider with over 100 years of experience. It caters for students at the local level, the national level and the international level. TAFE NSW has over 130 locations across the state. Through a s...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

McGraw Hill







TAFE NSW






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)
McGraw Hill has 105.13% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TAFE NSW in 2026.
Incident History - McGraw Hill (X = Date, Y = Severity)
McGraw Hill cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - TAFE NSW (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TAFE NSW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

McGraw Hill

TAFE NSW
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.
Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.