Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

McGraw HillMcGraw Hill
VS
ESSESS
McGraw Hill

McGraw Hill

1325 Avenue of the Americas, New York, 10019, US

Last Update: 27/07/2026

View Profile
377/1000Critical

We are a leading global education company that partners with millions of educators, learners and professionals around the world. At McGraw Hill, we believe that your diverse experiences enrich the way you learn, teach and grow. Every educator teaches differently. Every ...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:8,141
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2
ESS

ESS

9202 S Northshore Dr, Knoxville, 37922, US

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ESS.com
780/1000Fair

As leaders in the education staffing space since 2000, ESS specializes in placing qualified staff in daily, long-term, and permanent K-12 school district positions, including substitute teachers, paraprofessionals, and other school support staff. Over the last 24 years,...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:14,412
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
McGraw Hill

McGraw Hill

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ESS

ESS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

McGraw Hill has 105.13% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ESS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - McGraw Hill (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McGraw Hill cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ESS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ESS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
McGraw Hill

McGraw Hill

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ROCANOVIMMCGMATADT1777395770
🔒 Incident : Breach
MCGVERHARUDE1777034314
🔒 Incident : Breach
MCGSAL1776191039
ESS

ESS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between McGraw Hill company and ESS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between McGraw Hill company and ESS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between McGraw Hill company and ESS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between McGraw Hill company and ESS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between McGraw Hill company and ESS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between McGraw Hill company and ESS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between McGraw Hill company and ESS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between McGraw Hill company and ESS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between McGraw Hill company and ESS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between McGraw Hill company and ESS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between McGraw Hill company and ESS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between McGraw Hill and ESS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between McGraw Hill and ESS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - McGraw Hill or ESS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - McGraw Hill or ESS ?
Between McGraw Hill and ESS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between McGraw Hill and ESS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3